Welcome to European Tribune. It's gone a bit quiet around here these days, but it's still going.
I'm sorry for my deficient English expression. I think I should try to explain what I meant.

  1. The word "income" is not what I did not like:  I did not like the "concept" of "being rich" = "having money", especially as socio-political objective, public and private, and as a synonym of "social wealth". I wanted to give a nuanced answer to your question: How can we arrange an economy so that we get richer?

  2. I agree: it's important not to lose sight of the system as is, as well as the system we'd like. The system, as it's, requires "income" ("money"):  but to obtain "social wealth". Wealth is not getting money, although money is needed to get wealth.

  3. We need increase societal income/wealth/well-being. The current crisis raises the question of to obtain the necessary wealth, the necessary resources. But, as we have to operate in the real -not utopian- world, we must ask, for the future without crisis, how we have to to obtain resources and also by the ideology that must underlie it.

  4. Particularly if we consider countries in the European periphery - we need to find a way to improve their wealth that isn't dependent on out-trading other countries. Can we dispense with the global or transnational relationship in this world as it is?

by PerCLupi on Sat Sep 1st, 2012 at 08:15:01 AM EST

Others have rated this comment as follows:

JakeS 4


Occasional Series