The European Tribune is a forum for thoughtful dialogue of European and international issues. You are invited to post comments and your own articles.
Please REGISTER to post.
"In fact, inflation cannot be caused by bankers or corporations, by definition." Pardon me? Whose definition? OK - maybe government policy is the important causation. Then who controls the government?
At least in the U.S., where the government has steadily eroded the 'social safety net's system' response to price increases (better term than inflation?), the effect is wealth transfer from this system to the main beneficiaries of the other government-based welfare system - corporations and banks (particularly the military-industrial complex).
To spell it out - the major cause of spending power erosion for working people is corporate and financial action.
In reality, there is no other cause. Between increased costs due to speculation, oligopolistic profiteering, and overbilling for government services, with a bit of corruption to grease the wheels, wage demands and government welfare spending are pretty much irrelevant. (And when was the last time you heard of someone making a wage demand?)
The 'by definition' part is the fact that even on those rare occasions when corporate and financial action is quietly - very quietly - allowed to have created inflation, the only acceptable remedies are further downward pressure on wages, and cuts to government spending.
Price - i.e. profit - controls are utterly unacceptable.
In economic propaganda-land, there is no causal link whatsoever between increased prices created by asset/commodity profiteering+speculation, and official unicorn fart inflation, which is the number that gets bandied around on the news as a target.
Only worker demands and public spending can create inflation. No other economic agent is ever responsible.
If it starts to look like some other agent might be responsible, you can - and should - change the technical calculation used to define the inflation figures, and all is right with the world again. (E.g. I understand that by using vintage definitions of inflation, the real rate in most Western countries is very much higher than the 2% or so we're told it is.)
Of course all of this is insane double-think, and a naked lie. Even so - it's a very popular and persistent lie.
I don't doubt some economists have a more sophisticated understanding. But if they do they won't get a lot of air time, and they'll have even less opportunity to set policy.
by Frank Schnittger - Feb 21 1 comment
by gmoke - Feb 28
by Frank Schnittger - Feb 19 1 comment
by Oui - Feb 18 33 comments
by Oui - Feb 8 3 comments
by Oui - Mar 3
by Oui - Mar 21 comment
by Oui - Mar 19 comments
by Oui - Feb 2926 comments
by Oui - Feb 2911 comments
by Oui - Feb 29
by gmoke - Feb 28
by Oui - Feb 2820 comments
by Oui - Feb 2815 comments
by Oui - Feb 27
by Oui - Feb 2611 comments
by Oui - Feb 261 comment
by Oui - Feb 256 comments
by Oui - Feb 243 comments
by Oui - Feb 233 comments
by Oui - Feb 23
by Oui - Feb 227 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Feb 211 comment
by Oui - Feb 2122 comments
by Oui - Feb 203 comments