Welcome to European Tribune. It's gone a bit quiet around here these days, but it's still going.
Display:
The Europeans received all the benefits of trade, technology transfer, and the Global Awakening without paying the cost of Mongol conquest. The Mongols had killed off the knights in Hungary and Germany, but they had not destroyed or occupied the cities.

Hm. From what I learnt at school and read later, in Hungary cities – including the one I live in now – were destroyed (it happened only West of the Danube that Mongol troops bypassed fortified positions because they were chasing the fleeing king and his remaining troops), so were villages, one third to half of the total population died, and although there was a one-year occupation period when the Mongolian army created civil administration, its main aim was collecting food supplies and it was marked by trade in women and widespread rape. While Ferguson is a racist apologist for European empires, I think the role of other empires in the spread of trade and knowledge shouldn't be used to airbrush out the brutal nature of Empire, either.

*Lunatic*, n.
One whose delusions are out of fashion.

by DoDo on Fri May 10th, 2013 at 03:32:08 PM EST
Fair enough - to be fair to the author I excerpted from his summing up and he is talking relatively, compared to Mongol campaigns elsewhere.

He does detail the Hungarian campaign and notes atrocities although he claims of all the Mongol campaigns, including the Hungarian one, that accounts of population deaths are regularly exaggerated.

by Metatone (metatone [a|t] gmail (dot) com) on Fri May 10th, 2013 at 03:52:32 PM EST
[ Parent ]
I found a meta-study (in Hungarian) detailing the studies with numbers.
  • There is one contemporary source that definitely exaggerated, claiming total destruction. Another (an eyewitness monk who also reported on the civil administration and the rapes) gives no percentage but tells of walking across uninhabited land for days.
  • The 50% figure comes from a study on the basis of disappeared place-names. This is a figure for the whole kingdom; but east of the Danube, there were areas with 75% of places disappearing from records (the same areas that would face near-total destruction in the Habsburg wars to re-take these areas from the Ottoman Empire, BTW) while west of the Danube and in the mountainous region that is now most of Slovakia it was 10%.
  • A later study took into account the fact that different settlements have different populations and people can flee and hide, and also relied on later censuses. It estimated a 15-20% (300-400,000) death toll.
  • Another study challenged all earlier Middle Age population estimates on the basis of feudal records, significantly lowering them on the basis of village church sizes (church attendance was compulsory by civil law, a heritage of forced conversion). The population decline around the Mongol invasion is 10-15% (130-180,000).


*Lunatic*, n.
One whose delusions are out of fashion.
by DoDo on Fri May 10th, 2013 at 04:25:39 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Post-conquest Mongol subjugation was rather light - a tithe (10%) compares favorably to the modern taxation and costs of financial services. Monasteries were exempt.

How does the Mongol cultural impact compare with Byzantine's? The language of this diary implies a very dramatic Mongol influence.

by das monde on Sat May 11th, 2013 at 03:39:21 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:

Occasional Series