Welcome to European Tribune. It's gone a bit quiet around here these days, but it's still going.
Confusion about EROI might have the same source: special interests.

I'd rather avoid the conspiratorial thinking, especially as a friend of mine has written a paper about this very thing.

So are we free to do what we "feel like it", or are we "absolutely dependent"?

We are absolutely dependent on electricity generation, and free to expand it as much as we feel like. There isn't really any practical limits on how much wind, solar and nuclear electricity we could generate, if we decided to.

Any process with EROI < 1 is a part of metabolism, not the input.

Still, this doesn't help the policy-maker at all. Should we exploit that 0.5 EROI oil-field or not? Sure, let's just call it metabolism then. Who cares what we call it when it still gives us a valuable product which can be sold for more than the cost of production and gives us a nice margin at our current cost of capital?

Peak oil is not an energy crisis. It is a liquid fuel crisis.

by Starvid on Wed Jul 24th, 2013 at 06:26:06 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Others have rated this comment as follows: