Welcome to European Tribune. It's gone a bit quiet around here these days, but it's still going.
Display:
I think maybe people on the liberal left, social democrats and the like, need to take a deep breath and realise their ideology is bankrupt, the only thing giving them successes in the past being the pressure from real existing socialism in state form and the fear that put into Capital.

I'm not generally a fan of permitting effect to precede cause in my models of reality, and by the time the first world war rolled around the Danish social democrats had had the power to affect a months-long general strike for fifteen years. And had used that power to gain substantial concessions in terms of the right to strike and organize.

I think a more serious problem for the social democrats is that they need an active, credible domestic communist threat, or they go off script. And after the communist parties wedded themselves to what was even then quite obviously the losing side in the Great Game, it was all over bar the shouting.

- Jake

Friends come and go. Enemies accumulate.

by JakeS (JangoSierra 'at' gmail 'dot' com) on Thu Aug 29th, 2013 at 04:13:03 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Hm, but pre-wwI was there even a communist (or revolutionary socialist) organisation in Denmark? In Sweden there wasn't, the revolutionary socialists and reformist socialists was in the same unions and the same party.

So I think treating the soc-dems as something static over a hundred years are wrong.

Then the effect of the cold war and the communist bloc, I think was that the right by and large in the anglo world and western Europe (with exceptions) turned left and accepted soc-dem governments and social reforms. Without threatening civil war or coups.

Sweden's finest (and perhaps only) collaborative, leftist e-newspaper Synapze.se

by A swedish kind of death on Thu Aug 29th, 2013 at 05:11:57 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Hm, but pre-wwI was there even a communist (or revolutionary socialist) organisation in Denmark? In Sweden there wasn't, the revolutionary socialists and reformist socialists was in the same unions and the same party.

Yes, they were organized around different unions.

- Jake

Friends come and go. Enemies accumulate.

by JakeS (JangoSierra 'at' gmail 'dot' com) on Fri Aug 30th, 2013 at 06:25:08 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:

Occasional Series