Welcome to European Tribune. It's gone a bit quiet around here these days, but it's still going.
Display:
Freiheit statt Kapitalismus - WikipediaFreiheit statt Kapitalismus - Wikipedia
Die frei verfügbaren Kapitalmassen entstammen der Umverteilung zulasten der Löhne und zugunsten der Kapitaleigner und fielen in der Privatisierung der Altersversorgung an. Allerdings erklärt das nach Wagenknecht das Entstehen der Finanzkrise nicht hinreichend, sondern eine bedeutsame Quelle der entstandenen Kapitalmassen liegt in dem Mechanismus der Geldschöpfung der globalisierten Banken. Vor der Globalisierung hatten die Banken die Pflicht zu einer gesetzlich festgelegten Mindestreserve. Diese bedeutete, dass nur ein bestimmter Teil der eingelegten Gelder verliehen werden durfte. Diese Sicherung wurde durch zahlreiche Möglichkeiten, die Mindestreserve zu drücken, gelockert oder abgeschafft, was zu einer nahezu unbegrenzten Möglichkeit einer Kreditschöpfung führte. Dies hatte nur deshalb keine inflationäre Wirkung, da dieses Geld im Finanzkreislauf zirkulierte und nicht zum Kauf von Wirtschaftsgütern verwendet wurde, so Wagenknecht. Mit dieser Jahrzehnte dauernden Deregulierung hat es das globale Finanzsystem geschafft, ohne Rückgriff auf zusätzliche Zentralbankgelder theoretisch unendliche Kreditvolumina zu erzeugen, denn die Mindestreserve ist heute kein Hebel mehr, um die Kreditvolumina zu begrenzen.[15]The freely available masses of capital come from the redistribution at the expense of Wages to the benefit of holders of capital and the privatization of pensions. According to Wagenknecht the emergence of the financial crisis this is not sufficient to explain the financial crisis. A significant source for the masses of capital is the money creation of globalised banks. Before globalization, the banks had a duty to hold statutory reserves. This meant that only a certain part of the funds deposited could be lent out. This security measure was loosened of abolished by various possibilities to reduce the minimum reserve levels which led to near unlimited credit creation. According to Wagenknecht the only reason this didn't have inflationary effects was that the money circulated in the financial sector and wasn't used to buy economic goods. with these decades of deregulation the global financial system managed to create theoretical infinite amounts of credit without having to call on additional central bank money. The minimal reserve is no longer a lever to limit credit creation. [15]  

No Post-Keynesianism here.

by generic on Tue Aug 27th, 2013 at 06:27:05 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Writing crap mortgages and then rehypothecating crap, which formed the basis of the bubble based on US real estate would fall under Keynes' "When the capital development of a country becomes a by-product of the activities of a casino, the job is likely to be ill-done" caveat and is definitely not recommended Keynesian economic policy. The fact that Keynes used hyperbolic arguments in certain situations, such as a debt-deflation death spiral, does not mean he advocated such policies be applied in any and all circumstances.

"It is not necessary to have hope in order to persevere."
by ARGeezer (ARGeezer a in a circle eurotrib daught com) on Tue Aug 27th, 2013 at 11:17:42 AM EST
[ Parent ]
The problem here is that her model of banking is entirely conventional and she has a lot quantity of money thinking going.
That might cause problems in the unlikely case they ever get to enact policy.
by generic on Tue Aug 27th, 2013 at 01:58:06 PM EST
[ Parent ]
And it doesn't seem likely that she would even have a chance to do anything anyway.

"It is not necessary to have hope in order to persevere."
by ARGeezer (ARGeezer a in a circle eurotrib daught com) on Tue Aug 27th, 2013 at 03:43:08 PM EST
[ Parent ]
It will be interesting to see where she is in ten  years' time.
by afew (afew(a in a circle)eurotrib_dot_com) on Wed Aug 28th, 2013 at 01:52:56 AM EST
[ Parent ]
The FDP?

Finance is the brain [tumour] of the economy
by Carrie (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Wed Aug 28th, 2013 at 01:54:06 AM EST
[ Parent ]
If, in 10 years' time, it's big enough to float her boat.
by afew (afew(a in a circle)eurotrib_dot_com) on Wed Aug 28th, 2013 at 02:32:23 AM EST
[ Parent ]
She's basically saying bank lending is reserve constrained, not equity constrained.

Finance is the brain [tumour] of the economy
by Carrie (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Tue Aug 27th, 2013 at 04:14:28 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Is not that the case in the Euro-zone?

"It is not necessary to have hope in order to persevere."
by ARGeezer (ARGeezer a in a circle eurotrib daught com) on Wed Aug 28th, 2013 at 11:38:54 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Why do you say that?

Finance is the brain [tumour] of the economy
by Carrie (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Wed Aug 28th, 2013 at 11:41:21 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Isn't that the formal mechanism the Fed uses with US banks? They can make a loan in excess of their reserves, but they have to be able to get the reserves shortly to meet the reserve requirement and that has some small cost.

"It is not necessary to have hope in order to persevere."
by ARGeezer (ARGeezer a in a circle eurotrib daught com) on Wed Aug 28th, 2013 at 11:49:44 AM EST
[ Parent ]
How is that different from what the ECB does?
by generic on Wed Aug 28th, 2013 at 12:03:35 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Operationally: The ECB extends (over)collateralized loans to banks against unimpeachable collateral (read: Treasury issue). The Fed buys and sells assets of unimpeachable soundness (read: Treasury issue).

In practice: The Fed uses a cruder tool than the ECB, but the Fed uses its tool with much greater skill. The outcome is practically indistinguishable.

- Jake

Friends come and go. Enemies accumulate.

by JakeS (JangoSierra 'at' gmail 'dot' com) on Wed Aug 28th, 2013 at 02:22:46 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Reserves are a fraction of deposits, not of loans.

Finance is the brain [tumour] of the economy
by Carrie (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Wed Aug 28th, 2013 at 12:05:47 PM EST
[ Parent ]
And deposits are liabilities.

"It is not necessary to have hope in order to persevere."
by ARGeezer (ARGeezer a in a circle eurotrib daught com) on Wed Aug 28th, 2013 at 12:12:06 PM EST
[ Parent ]
And reserves are assets.

Finance is the brain [tumour] of the economy
by Carrie (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Wed Aug 28th, 2013 at 12:32:15 PM EST
[ Parent ]
That is only an operational constraint if your central bank likes to crash your banking system.

Which the ECBuBa uses as a strategic threat to usurp the power of democratically elected parliaments, but not something they have ever actually done for real.

- Jake

Friends come and go. Enemies accumulate.

by JakeS (JangoSierra 'at' gmail 'dot' com) on Wed Aug 28th, 2013 at 12:18:20 PM EST
[ Parent ]
And there are also equity capital requirements along with rules as to what counts in tiers, Basel I & II. So it would seem that banks have both reserve and capital requirements, with the capital requirements being the usual rub, as the Central Bank can supply reserves at will at a price, but should the Central Bank, for whatever reason, not supply the reserves that could make a given bank insolvent overnight. Wouldn't they normally 'resolve' that bank rather than not supplying reserves?

"It is not necessary to have hope in order to persevere."
by ARGeezer (ARGeezer a in a circle eurotrib daught com) on Wed Aug 28th, 2013 at 12:45:17 PM EST
[ Parent ]
And there are also equity capital requirements along with rules as to what counts in tiers, Basel I & II.

Yes, and those are binding.

but should the Central Bank, for whatever reason,

Then the ATMs will stop working until parliament finds itself a new central banker. Which, depending on how far parliament has its head up its ass, may be before or after the angry mob who now cannot spend their wages to buy food finds itself a new parliament.

not supply the reserves that could make a given bank insolvent overnight. Wouldn't they normally 'resolve' that bank rather than not supplying reserves?

Illiquid, not insolvent. The bank will only become insolvent after they distress sell assets to cover their liquidity requirements.

But sane central banks never deliberately create bank runs on their own banking system like that. Partly because it's a game of musical chairs: All liquidity comes, in the final analysis, from the central bank. So if the central bank withdraws enough liquidity from the system that a bank must fold due to liquidity requirements, then (at least) one bank will fold when the music stops... and it may not be the bank the CB wanted to kill.

- Jake

Friends come and go. Enemies accumulate.

by JakeS (JangoSierra 'at' gmail 'dot' com) on Wed Aug 28th, 2013 at 02:19:59 PM EST
[ Parent ]
The central bank supplies reserves to preserve the payments system. It has no choice, bank resolution is a fiscal action.

Finance is the brain [tumour] of the economy
by Carrie (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Wed Aug 28th, 2013 at 02:53:14 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Unless the central bank stages what effectively amounts to a coup d'etat and starts usurping fiscal function.

Particularly if nobody in the government has the balls to call its bluff and send armed goons to its place of business...

- Jake

Friends come and go. Enemies accumulate.

by JakeS (JangoSierra 'at' gmail 'dot' com) on Wed Aug 28th, 2013 at 02:55:39 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:

Occasional Series