The European Tribune is a forum for thoughtful dialogue of European and international issues. You are invited to post comments and your own articles.
Please REGISTER to post.
Russia helped with transit and airspace in the Afghan War, Russia saved Libya from airstrikes by negotiating chemical weapon disposal, Russia is suffering from a 400% increase in Afghan poppy production since the Taliban regained power leading to increased rates of heroin addiction, Russia helped the joint Space Station mission, Putin sees that NATO breaks its promises, while claiming the moral high ground. Putin's Chechnya intel could have saved Boston from the bombing.
It seems to my admittedly jaundiced eye that someone thought Putin would invade Crimea and thus provide a reason to further demonise him, but that didn't work as Crimeans saw the writing on the wall and cut loose from Kiev once it became clear that their choice was between two kinds of totalitarianism, the Russian kind that kills journalists, imprisons punk rioters and oligarchs and pretends to be a democracy, against the guys with the flash ties talking about IMF loans designed to indebit generations, also pretending to be a democracy, and loftily preaching that its interests are beyond criticism or judgment, because corporate money rules, baby, in the name of freedom to profit anywhere anytime and austerity forces whole countries to their knees.
The efforts to justify the invasion of Iraq sound to the rest of the world as ludicrously bad faith, making the E-USA protagonists look increasingly impotent as they swagger and preen cluelessly sounding belligerent and enacting sanctions. They know it will take 20 years to build the infrastructure to supply the EU with American Fracked gas, the costs getting it here make the EROI look retarded. So that's a nice dream for the oiligarchs but not remotely realistic in the short to medium term.
So it's not about principle, (ritual lip-flapping notwithstanding), it's not about gas even, which leaves only one possible reason to keep trying to wind Putin up, which is to shock doctrine Ukraine while mouthing platitudes of friendship, and give NATO something to do, being a military organisation it is frothing at the bit to get some battle experience (quicker promotions) and thereby justify its existence.
It is horrifying to see this playing out, at the beginning I was fairly sanguine about anything really threatening to world peace yet now by deductive reasoning it appears that there's a Dr. Strangelove element that wants a hot war, ASAFP.
Because it will fatten a lot of wallets conveniently parked very far away from the battlefield, or to divert world media attention from other issues of equally grave import, such as an upcoming Bankster Bailout to be forced on savers and pensioners, a new Supreme Court decision placing even more political power into the hands of the super-rich perhaps? A dollar crash as China, the BRICS, rebel elements in Europe and Russia opt out of the petro-eurodollar and create a currency basket?
Any or all of the above...?
It was utterly predictable ten years ago that signing longterm European gas contracts with Putin would come to this, but some saw their chance to peel off billions by middlemanning and they created this shituation, selling our security and capital away to enrich Mad Bad Vlad the Impaler.
What could possibly go wrong? 'The history of public debt is full of irony. It rarely follows our ideas of order and justice.' Thomas Piketty
But Putin is not playing. He is looking ahead at the hard and uncertain task of maintaining a functioning country. Everything he does relates to that goal.
He knows well that the West is a declining empire specializing in short-term crazy gambles. His main challenge, which he recognizes, is not to get sucked in. He seems cautious because he is cautious.
But our elites mistake caution for someone about to back down. Putin is not about to back down on those things that matter. He will certainly not fire on NATO troops if there is another way. But if there is no other way? Our elites will be shitting bricks as they watch their hare-brained, off-the-top-of-the-head, best-case policies go awry. Then it will be NATO--not the Russians--trying to decide if they really and truly want to go nuclear.
Think back to Syria. What put paid to NATO's beloved no-fly zone? Probably that Russia was offering the Syrians the real-time info to shoot NATO planes out of the sky, as well as sink the American cruise-missile ships.
The good news was that the US Air Force was not ready to take major casualties. They still aren't. The rush to war is being driven by the politicians--who are clueless and desperate--not the military, who have just had a decade of bitter experience with best-case-scenerios dissolving in the face of hard reality.
--Gaianne The Fates are kind.
Asia Times Online's Spengler coined a formulation: "A specter is haunting Europe, and that is the specter of a Russian-Chinese alliance at the expense of Europe." The alliance is already on -- manifested in the G-20, the BRICS and the Shanghai Cooperation Organization. There are military technology synergies on the horizon -- the ultra-sophisticated S-500 air defense system is to be unveiled by Moscow, and Beijing would absolutely love to have it. But for the real fireworks, just wait a few weeks, when Putin visits Beijing in May. That's when he will sign the famous $1 trillion gas deal according to which Gazprom will supply China's CNPC with 3.75 billion cubic feet of gas a day for 30 years, starting in 2018 (China's current daily gas demand is around 16 billion cubic feet). Gazprom may still collect most of its profits from Europe, but Asia is its privileged future. On the competition front, the hyper-hyped U.S. shale "revolution" is a myth -- as much as the notion the U.S. will be suddenly increasing exports of gas to the rest of the world any time soon. Gazprom will use this mega-deal to boost investment in eastern Siberia -- which sooner rather than later will be configured as the privileged hub for gas shipments to both Japan and South Korea. That's the ultimate (substantial) reason why Asia won't "isolate" Russia. (See Asia will not 'isolate' Russia, Asia Times Online, March 25, 2014.) Not to mention the much-anticipated "thermonuclear" (for the petrodollar) possibility that Russia and China will agree payment for the Gazprom-CNPC deal may be in yuan or rubles. That will be the dawn of a basket of currencies as the new international reserve currency -- a key BRICS objective and the ultimate, incendiary, new (economic) fact on the ground.
Asia Times Online's Spengler coined a formulation: "A specter is haunting Europe, and that is the specter of a Russian-Chinese alliance at the expense of Europe." The alliance is already on -- manifested in the G-20, the BRICS and the Shanghai Cooperation Organization. There are military technology synergies on the horizon -- the ultra-sophisticated S-500 air defense system is to be unveiled by Moscow, and Beijing would absolutely love to have it. But for the real fireworks, just wait a few weeks, when Putin visits Beijing in May.
That's when he will sign the famous $1 trillion gas deal according to which Gazprom will supply China's CNPC with 3.75 billion cubic feet of gas a day for 30 years, starting in 2018 (China's current daily gas demand is around 16 billion cubic feet).
Gazprom may still collect most of its profits from Europe, but Asia is its privileged future. On the competition front, the hyper-hyped U.S. shale "revolution" is a myth -- as much as the notion the U.S. will be suddenly increasing exports of gas to the rest of the world any time soon.
Gazprom will use this mega-deal to boost investment in eastern Siberia -- which sooner rather than later will be configured as the privileged hub for gas shipments to both Japan and South Korea. That's the ultimate (substantial) reason why Asia won't "isolate" Russia. (See Asia will not 'isolate' Russia, Asia Times Online, March 25, 2014.)
Not to mention the much-anticipated "thermonuclear" (for the petrodollar) possibility that Russia and China will agree payment for the Gazprom-CNPC deal may be in yuan or rubles. That will be the dawn of a basket of currencies as the new international reserve currency -- a key BRICS objective and the ultimate, incendiary, new (economic) fact on the ground.
Oh, I think we do. He's a former KGB colonel and a hard-nosed politician. He's the only one who appears to be acting rationally in the sense of "realist" geopolitics. While his tactics may be unpredictable, that's part of a "rational" approach to conflict, attempting to exploit surprise to his advantage.
Living in postmodern democracies we're not used to this kind of old-fashioned statecraft, but we cannot say we can't understand him. A society committed to the notion that government is always bad will have bad government. And it doesn't have to be that way. — Paul Krugman
I'm imagining him going to bed every night, looking in the mirror and thinking "I can't believe you got away with that, you wily Russian bear you".
And that's me put off lunch.
Taking control of Crimea with unidentified troops was a stroke of brilliance. Puting is crazy, but he's not a madman. Whether or not he got to keep it after that depended on what the other side did. A society committed to the notion that government is always bad will have bad government. And it doesn't have to be that way. — Paul Krugman
Maybe it needs further editing. ;) 'The history of public debt is full of irony. It rarely follows our ideas of order and justice.' Thomas Piketty
You'd exclaim "that's crazy!", half amused and annoyed. A society committed to the notion that government is always bad will have bad government. And it doesn't have to be that way. — Paul Krugman
Funny, the first time I read that I thought you were talking about Obama... you know the guy who turned interdimensional chess up to 11?
Now Putin just showed him it actually goes to 12. 'The history of public debt is full of irony. It rarely follows our ideas of order and justice.' Thomas Piketty
The only one who didn't drink the party punch spiked with brown acid and Kool-Aide. 'The history of public debt is full of irony. It rarely follows our ideas of order and justice.' Thomas Piketty
by Frank Schnittger - May 27
by Frank Schnittger - May 5 22 comments
by Frank Schnittger - May 23 1 comment
by Oui - May 13 64 comments
by Carrie - Apr 30 7 comments
by Oui - May 273 comments
by Oui - May 24
by Frank Schnittger - May 231 comment
by Oui - May 1364 comments
by Oui - May 910 comments
by Frank Schnittger - May 522 comments
by Oui - May 449 comments
by Oui - May 312 comments
by Oui - May 29 comments
by gmoke - May 1
by Oui - Apr 30242 comments
by Carrie - Apr 307 comments
by Oui - Apr 2830 comments
by Oui - Apr 2644 comments
by Oui - Apr 876 comments
by Oui - Mar 19143 comments