The European Tribune is a forum for thoughtful dialogue of European and international issues. You are invited to post comments and your own articles.
Please REGISTER to post.
If we want to rule out lethal aid, then what options are available? Do we accept the idea that the Ukrainian State is essentially failing? If so, how do we in the West confront this?
If one does not view creating failed states in Russia's sphere of interest (and I'm not counting out the possibility that the US has precisely that motive), then the only solution is to give Russia carte blanche to massive troop deployments (and the accompanying atrocities that always and everywhere follow massive troop deployments). Ukraine is incapable of maintaining effective and credible state power, and Russia will never - to the point of calling down atomic fire from the skies - accept that any other power takes it upon itself to police Ukraine.
So, Russian "peacekeepers" or no peacekeepers whatever.
Friends come and go. Enemies accumulate.
One of the reasons that the ability to keep order is failing is because the police are passive. To some extent this is because they are incompetent, but at another level I wonder if a lack of motivation is at work here. These Ukrainian copes are getting paid something like $200 a month. Russian cops get ten times that. Maybe before the West dumps small arms, we ought to consider fronting the cash to immediately bring police pay into line with that in Russia. This could generate a lot of "motivation," but alas austerity.
And I'll give my consent to any government that does not deny a man a living wage-Billy Bragg
Russia wants Ukraine to remain in their sphere of influence, and are prepared to go clear up to "tanks in the streets" levels of escalation to get their way.
The Americans are not politically prepared to go there, and the European countries which are politically prepared to go there lack the military wherewithal to follow through, while the ones who could go to war from a military perspective lack the political inclination to do so.
So Ukraine is going to end up in the Russian camp. The only question is how many people are going to get shot first.
In that context, the best thing that can happen to Ukraine is losing quickly and decisively, because the alternative is to lose slowly and painfully.
Use of military force to quell protests shows how desperate the authorities in Kiev are. Army is too blunt of a tool to resolve political discourses, and very inefficient in urban areas, unless the government is prepared to kill scores of civilians and can expect the military to carry out orders without questioning. Russia learnt this lesson the hard way in Chechnya.
Where will the crisis go from here? I'm afraid making any forecast in this situation is virtually impossible. There are too many moving parts in it. But without dialogue between the government and leaders of the protesters, and the West keeping the pressure of further sanctions on Russia, the likelihood of Eastern provinces peeling off looks pretty high to me.
Maybe before the West dumps small arms, we ought to consider fronting the cash to immediately bring police pay into line with that in Russia. This could generate a lot of "motivation," but alas austerity.
Austerity: the self-defeating population-defeating Washington-Brussels consensus.
by Frank Schnittger - Feb 21 1 comment
by gmoke - Feb 28
by Frank Schnittger - Feb 19 1 comment
by Oui - Feb 18 33 comments
by Oui - Feb 8 3 comments
by Oui - Mar 33 comments
by Oui - Mar 21 comment
by Oui - Mar 19 comments
by Oui - Feb 2926 comments
by Oui - Feb 2911 comments
by Oui - Feb 29
by gmoke - Feb 28
by Oui - Feb 2820 comments
by Oui - Feb 2815 comments
by Oui - Feb 27
by Oui - Feb 2611 comments
by Oui - Feb 261 comment
by Oui - Feb 256 comments
by Oui - Feb 243 comments
by Oui - Feb 233 comments
by Oui - Feb 23
by Oui - Feb 227 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Feb 211 comment
by Oui - Feb 2122 comments
by Oui - Feb 203 comments