The European Tribune is a forum for thoughtful dialogue of European and international issues. You are invited to post comments and your own articles.
Please REGISTER to post.
If the general idea is that past debts should be paid always, regardless of government changes, then either the German government pays up or it doesn't demand that others do. The 1940s isn't that far away. It is frequent that countries pay off debts incurred a century ago.
As for the loan itself, this is what it is all about according to the renowned German historian Hagen Fleischer, a man who is one of the foremost authorities on the Nazi occupation of Greece and the Greek Civil war:
...it's important in this case to make a distinction between reparation payments for war crimes and repayments of so-called Besatzungsanleihe: monthly loans demanded from the Greek government in 1942-44 to pay for the maintenance costs of the German army in Greece and further military activity in the Mediterranean, even delivering food from starving Greece to Rommel's "Afrika-Korps". In early 1945, in the final days of the Third Reich, a group of high-ranking German economists calculated this "German debt (Reichsschuld) to the Greek state" to amount to 476m Reichsmarks, which would be roughly 10bn today. Compared with the highly emotionally charged issue of wartime reparations, this debt is relatively free of moralistic baggage. It could - and should - form the basis for talks about the foundation of a "future fund", a foundation dedicated to a joint rehabilitation of a "shared" history and the financing of a symbolic infrastructure project. This would however require a major change of attitude on Germany's behalf. Only Berlin has the power to open talks about a historic consolidation with Greece. Until then, we continue to exist with an absurd situation where democratically elected German postwar governments of all colours continue to be in denial about the existence of this debt, which was officially recognized even by the Nazi regime.
Compared with the highly emotionally charged issue of wartime reparations, this debt is relatively free of moralistic baggage. It could - and should - form the basis for talks about the foundation of a "future fund", a foundation dedicated to a joint rehabilitation of a "shared" history and the financing of a symbolic infrastructure project.
This would however require a major change of attitude on Germany's behalf. Only Berlin has the power to open talks about a historic consolidation with Greece. Until then, we continue to exist with an absurd situation where democratically elected German postwar governments of all colours continue to be in denial about the existence of this debt, which was officially recognized even by the Nazi regime.
So 'It was a long time and doesn't matter any more' is hardly a - literal - get out of jail free card.
But the real problem with the loan argument is that it attacks the entire foundation of German self-regard as a creditor nation, and undermines German racist views about lazy southern beggars.
Some squealing about that is only to be expected.
Greece's solidarity and generocity towards Germany was a contributor to the "whole founding idea of the EU" whereas the mantra that "lazy Greeks should not expect neither solidarity nor generocity..." must be one of the pilars for "our common European future".
Fuck me senseless!
Thta is nonsens, whatever the guy says. As he himself clearly explains that was very much a part of war damages, in other words a repasration matter.
And to underscore the point:
", and the fact that today the Chair of the Greek Parliament announced the creation of a parliamentary committee to demand both, I think that the loan especially should be requested."
It is the same matter and this recently invented distinction is spurious.
" The 1940s isn't that far away. It is frequent that countries pay off debts incurred a century ago.
seventy years. And no, that isn't frequent at all. or obvious reasons
by gmoke - May 16
by gmoke - May 6
by rifek - May 4 3 comments
by gmoke - Apr 26 1 comment
by gmoke - Apr 20 1 comment
by rifek - Apr 18
by rifek - Apr 17 2 comments
by Oui - May 16
by Oui - May 14
by Oui - May 13
by Oui - May 82 comments
by rifek - May 43 comments
by Oui - May 42 comments
by Oui - May 4
by Oui - May 1
by Oui - Apr 27
by gmoke - Apr 261 comment
by Oui - Apr 25
by Oui - Apr 23
by Oui - Apr 22
by gmoke - Apr 201 comment
by Oui - Apr 204 comments
by gmoke - Apr 18