The European Tribune is a forum for thoughtful dialogue of European and international issues. You are invited to post comments and your own articles.
Please REGISTER to post.
The next, and most important step, as I've argued is the legislative elections next month: this is where the majority that will effectively govern France will be decided, the president having relatively little power in front of the parliament, in the end, Gaullist purity notwithstanding.
In the last three such exercises - legislative elections immediately following a presidential election, the French voters have always given the newly elected (or re-elected for Chirac 2002) a parliamentary majority. This preliminary poll from Les Echos show a similar trend:
What really precipitated the crisis was the voters decision to nominate a candidate with a real left wing program - Hamon - instead of the anointed Valls during last January's primaries. This gave the third-wayers the excuse to jump ship and openly support Macron, effectively sinking their own party.
If they do that, while keeping the logo, there is nowhere for the decent party members (and MPs) to go but left. It is rightly acknowledged that people of faith have no monopoly of virtue - Queen Elizabeth II
For example : all the blocs represented in the presidential election will present a candidate in every district, so : one far left, one Mélenchon, one PS/EELV. Also, they give an arbitrary boost to sitting candidates. This is not a good election for sitting candidates.
To be fair, all they can do is model. Neither the candidates nor even the forces in presence are clear yet. But the result will look nothing like that.
With this model they get only 52 to 78 left candidates surviving the first round, and only 34 to 51 elected. Those numbers are frankly ridiculous, bearing in mind that . The party structures will sort something out, to avoid a complete murder/suicide. Even if they don't, which is not impossible, left-wing voters are smarter than that. They will choose the locally-legitimate candidate, as they did nationally in the presidential, which is why Mélenchon got close to qualifying for the second round.
However, En Marche has the huge advantage of being in the middle. In any hypothetical four-way first round, it's likely (depending on the abstemtion rate) that two or three candidates will qualify for the second round. Assuming that EM is one of them, and that the LR or left candidate is eliminated, they are pretty much guaranteed to get the benefit of the eliminated candidate's votes in the second round.
So it would not be surprising if EM got something close to a majority. But it would be very surprising if the left were to be so completely wiped. Especially with the FN set to take a nosedive in the second round of the presidentials. It is rightly acknowledged that people of faith have no monopoly of virtue - Queen Elizabeth II
Especially with the FN set to take a nosedive in the second round of the presidentials.
Then we can get on with hating on Macron. It is rightly acknowledged that people of faith have no monopoly of virtue - Queen Elizabeth II
Same as the Macron "surge" in January, that was really a model if Bayrou didn't run, positioned Macron as frontrunner.
by gmoke - Nov 7
by gmoke - Nov 11
by gmoke - Nov 6
by gmoke - Oct 27
by Oui - Nov 17
by Oui - Nov 16
by Oui - Nov 161 comment
by Oui - Nov 15
by Oui - Nov 14
by Oui - Nov 13
by Oui - Nov 12
by Oui - Nov 11
by Oui - Nov 103 comments
by Oui - Nov 9
by Oui - Nov 81 comment
by Oui - Nov 8
by Oui - Nov 64 comments
by Oui - Nov 52 comments
by Oui - Nov 4