The European Tribune is a forum for thoughtful dialogue of European and international issues. You are invited to post comments and your own articles.
Please REGISTER to post.
He might even cast doubt about his rivals' fitness for security clearance in any administration, although he is not a subtle speaker.
Brennan is not currently a federal employee. He is a private citizen. His chances of being hired into the federal government while Trump is in office approaches zero. What has he got to lose?
He has no, zero need-to-know claim to confidential information about federal business --foreign or domestic-- conducted by the current administration's agencies. His tenure directing the CIA has ended and he has been replaced by someone purportedly more mendacious. Inexplicably millions of citizens who are employed and who are not by the federal government and its agents rely instead on public information to ascertain federal government "policy" and activities.
For example, elected members of the odious US Congress and its "oversight" committees often have been denied security clearance required to perform their duties to audit executive agencies' activities.
His security clearance --no one's security clearance-- is automatically renewed. Nor is it hereditary. Yet. Evidently some people who have never applied or worked for the federal government don't know this. Perhaps they do and count themselves among the faction seeking unspecified term of office and political "independence" for various, unelected agency directors.
Brennan's security clearance may be reinstated when christ is elected in 2020, if he wishes to defer "retirement" from whatever it is that he does so well that renders him indispensable in the functioning of the federal government. He is 62 and has not, so far as I know, created a gofundme account to supplement his unearned and earned income paid by the The University of Texas at Austin.
US State Department | FAQ, for example. Perhaps the FBI's background investigation of own officer and special agent candiates is less more rigorous. I wouldn't know and certainly wouldn't want to speculate as to what standard may be required come 2021.
PS. That Booman discussion is not unlike a Rorschach impression from that of the CA Cohort of Petty Landlords. I dread reading these.
Diversity is the key to economic and political evolution.
by Bernard - Jul 16 31 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Jul 14 14 comments
by ARGeezer - Jul 10 18 comments
by Oui - Jul 14 2 comments
by eurogreen - Jul 8 8 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Jul 10 27 comments
by gmoke - Jul 4 39 comments
by Oui - Jul 9 8 comments
by Oui - Jul 181 comment
by Bernard - Jul 1631 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Jul 1414 comments
by Oui - Jul 142 comments
by ARGeezer - Jul 1018 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Jul 1027 comments
by Oui - Jul 98 comments
by eurogreen - Jul 88 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Jul 532 comments
by gmoke - Jul 439 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Jul 252 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Jun 26106 comments
by Oui - Jun 219 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Jun 2032 comments
by IdiotSavant - Jun 2013 comments
by gmoke - Jun 187 comments