The European Tribune is a forum for thoughtful dialogue of European and international issues. You are invited to post comments and your own articles.
Please REGISTER to post.
He might even cast doubt about his rivals' fitness for security clearance in any administration, although he is not a subtle speaker.
Brennan is not currently a federal employee. He is a private citizen. His chances of being hired into the federal government while Trump is in office approaches zero. What has he got to lose?
He has no, zero need-to-know claim to confidential information about federal business --foreign or domestic-- conducted by the current administration's agencies. His tenure directing the CIA has ended and he has been replaced by someone purportedly more mendacious. Inexplicably millions of citizens who are employed and who are not by the federal government and its agents rely instead on public information to ascertain federal government "policy" and activities.
For example, elected members of the odious US Congress and its "oversight" committees often have been denied security clearance required to perform their duties to audit executive agencies' activities.
His security clearance --no one's security clearance-- is automatically renewed. Nor is it hereditary. Yet. Evidently some people who have never applied or worked for the federal government don't know this. Perhaps they do and count themselves among the faction seeking unspecified term of office and political "independence" for various, unelected agency directors.
Brennan's security clearance may be reinstated when christ is elected in 2020, if he wishes to defer "retirement" from whatever it is that he does so well that renders him indispensable in the functioning of the federal government. He is 62 and has not, so far as I know, created a gofundme account to supplement his unearned and earned income paid by the The University of Texas at Austin.
US State Department | FAQ, for example. Perhaps the FBI's background investigation of own officer and special agent candiates is less more rigorous. I wouldn't know and certainly wouldn't want to speculate as to what standard may be required come 2021.
PS. That Booman discussion is not unlike a Rorschach impression from that of the CA Cohort of Petty Landlords. I dread reading these.
Diversity is the key to economic and political evolution.
by ARGeezer - Aug 20 19 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Aug 16 60 comments
by Oui - Aug 21 3 comments
by Oui - Aug 18 34 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Aug 13 13 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Aug 8 125 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Aug 6 26 comments
by Oui - Aug 8 16 comments
by Oui - Aug 213 comments
by ARGeezer - Aug 2019 comments
by Oui - Aug 198 comments
by Oui - Aug 1834 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Aug 1660 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Aug 1313 comments
by Oui - Aug 816 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Aug 8125 comments
by Oui - Aug 75 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Aug 626 comments
by Oui - Aug 431 comments
by Oui - Aug 34 comments
by gmoke - Aug 21 comment
by Frank Schnittger - Aug 1115 comments
by Oui - Aug 19 comments
by Oui - Jul 3023 comments
by Oui - Jul 2823 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Jul 2711 comments
by IdiotSavant - Jul 255 comments
by john_evans - Jul 2580 comments