The European Tribune is a forum for thoughtful dialogue of European and international issues. You are invited to post comments and your own articles.
Please REGISTER to post.
The Quilette article says:
As David Gilmore's cross-cultural study of men shows (1990), in the small handful of cultures without patriarchy, men live a narcissistic Peter Pan existence, putting very little into the community and leaving most of the labor to women. Such societies have not developed beyond a rudimentary level, and cannot compete with their more highly organized and structured neighbors. This is why there are so few of them.
If the Democratic party becomes (so to speak) matriarchal, I would feel concerned about its fortunes against the Republicans. Honestly.
The two most prominent moral philosophers of the Enlightenment were David Hume and Immanuel Kant. Hume was a great empiricist, and he followed British sentimentalists in basing morality in exhibited values, sentiments of emotional, striving living humans. Kant formulated an abstract, universal moral reality based on reason.
The modern woke progressives are clearly Kantians, with strong intellectual sentiments about justice, equality, autonomy. They have laws how humans should be, but little interest how they really are.
Imagine a dystopian world where visceral human sentiments regarding sex are quite the opposite of what Kantian intellectuals conclude or may ever imagine. The thinking guys are fooled by smooth talk that implies that they have to follow their Kantian sentiments more earnestly, while in reality they thereby place themselves rather low for female preferences. A good deal of male boldness, domination is appreciated actually much better. Smart girls do not even know that they would not be really attracted to anyone less smart or cool than themselves. Equal or educated marriages are painfully unstable, while apparently awful patriarchal families are much smoother, have more kids. How would you want to help the progressives in this dystopian world?
It is good to remember Maslow's hierarchy of needs indeed. How should we know what self-actualization really means for humans of both genders? In the Kantian way, or in the Humean way? Hume was good with ladies in Paris salons. Kant never married.
Here is another Quilette article:
Video Games and the (Male) Meaning of Life
by Frank Schnittger - May 24 14 comments
by Frank Schnittger - May 25 8 comments
by Oui - May 23 23 comments
by Oui - May 23 9 comments
by Frank Schnittger - May 17 68 comments
by melo - May 23 9 comments
by ATinNM - May 22 10 comments
by IdiotSavant - May 15 4 comments
by Frank Schnittger - May 258 comments
by Frank Schnittger - May 2414 comments
by Oui - May 2323 comments
by Oui - May 239 comments
by melo - May 239 comments
by ATinNM - May 2210 comments
by gmoke - May 17
by Frank Schnittger - May 1768 comments
by Oui - May 1541 comments
by IdiotSavant - May 154 comments
by Oui - May 101 comment
by Oui - May 96 comments
by Oui - May 75 comments
by Frank Schnittger - May 516 comments
by Frank Schnittger - May 419 comments
by Frank Schnittger - May 334 comments
by Oui - May 214 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Apr 3016 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Apr 306 comments
by Oui - Apr 289 comments