Welcome to European Tribune. It's gone a bit quiet around here these days, but it's still going.
What was the question?

(SCOTUS version writ of certiorari, Rule 14. Content of a Petition for a Writ of Certiorari)

in re: Miller and Cherry appeals

27.Both cases raise the same four issues, although there is some overlap between the issues: (1) Is the question of whether the Prime Minister's advice to the Queen was lawful justiciable in a court of law? (2) If it is, by what standard is its lawfulness to be judged? (3) By that standard, was it lawful? (4) If it was not, what remedy should the court grant?
What standard? Scroll up to "evidence" listed in Syllabus of this diary entry. Scroll up in the Judgment to review admissible evidence considered by the SCOTUK.


Diversity is the key to economic and political evolution.

by Cat on Tue Sep 24th, 2019 at 03:21:47 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Others have rated this comment as follows:


Occasional Series