The European Tribune is a forum for thoughtful dialogue of European and international issues. You are invited to post comments and your own articles.
Please REGISTER to post.
The first asked whether Parliament had the right to extend prorogation for purely political reasons, to which the high Court said yes. The scottish court was asked if the Prime minister could have been honest in his dealings with the queen, to which it said no.
You see, it really does depend on how you ask your question and the scottish petitioners were more careful.
Tht said, the Scottish ruling has to be challenged because nobody actually knows what was said by the Prime minister to the Queen. So, I suspect that the Supreme court will uphold the decision in the English court and overturn that of the Scottish. Sadly, the law is right in that regard. keep to the Fen Causeway
And if so, can the Scottish members pass laws and regulations and rulings that apply across all of GB?
Very confusing.
Replaced the Lords of Appeal in Ordinary or Law Lords ... pretty archaic for a Parliamentary democracy ... that's why Boris Johnson fits so well as Brexit PM. 😡
by Frank Schnittger - Feb 23 7 comments
by Oui - Feb 22 8 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Feb 20 2 comments
by gmoke - Feb 14 2 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Feb 19 13 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Feb 15 23 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Feb 14 13 comments
by Oui - Feb 17 33 comments
by Oui - Feb 25
by Frank Schnittger - Feb 237 comments
by Oui - Feb 228 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Feb 202 comments
by Oui - Feb 2018 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Feb 1913 comments
by Oui - Feb 195 comments
by Oui - Feb 18
by Oui - Feb 1733 comments
by Oui - Feb 168 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Feb 1523 comments
by gmoke - Feb 142 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Feb 1413 comments
by Oui - Feb 144 comments
by Oui - Feb 1238 comments
by Oui - Feb 774 comments
by Oui - Feb 665 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Feb 518 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Feb 412 comments
by Oui - Feb 136 comments