You;d like to think that was true, but I think that both the rulings in the English and Scottish courts were correct, even inf they, supposedly, came to different conclusions.

The first asked whether Parliament had the right to extend prorogation for purely political reasons, to which the high Court said yes.
The scottish court was asked if the Prime minister could have been honest in his dealings with the queen, to which it said no.

You see, it really does depend on how you ask your question and the scottish petitioners were more careful.

Tht said, the Scottish ruling has to be challenged because nobody actually knows what was said by the Prime minister to the Queen. So, I suspect that the Supreme court will uphold the decision in the English court and overturn that of the Scottish. Sadly, the law is right in that regard.

keep to the Fen Causeway