Welcome to European Tribune. It's gone a bit quiet around here these days, but it's still going.
Display:
Should prorogation be ruled invalid by SCOTUK and Parliament be reconvened in September, say the 23rd, Parliament could then again seize control of the order and, at that time, vote no confidence in the administration. Grounds could be misleading the Queen and systematically undermining the sovereignty of Parliament.  They would then have the 14 days before they could call for a VOC for a new interim government led by Corbyn. Or just call the VOC and wait him out, pulling the trigger on the 15th day. In the process repeatedly make it clear that this is happening because Boris squandered his majority by expelling Remain Tories. Any number can play the game of making it up as they go.

They could find Boris in contempt of Parliament and lock him up in the clock tower or other facility that they could designate. That would impede further machinations. And they could pass legislation requiring the consent of Parliament to any prorogation. It would be hard for Boris' government to make credible arguments that this is a violation of custom, as the whole present situation is based on the government's ongoing violation of customs.

First drive a stake through the vampire, then deal with the angry mob. Elections could wait until April. By that time disillusionment would have set in for the average Brexiteer.

"It is not necessary to have hope in order to persevere."

by ARGeezer (ARGeezer a in a circle eurotrib daught com) on Thu Sep 19th, 2019 at 02:50:45 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Me thinks one option for the House of Commons would be to vote no confidence in Boris as PM and demand his resignation, but not vote no confidence in his government in the form prescribed by the Fixed Term Parliament Act (as this would trigger the 14 day period required to expire before a general election can be called) - a general election they would very likely lose so long as the Conservatives and the Brexit Party remain united.

The thing is, a majority of the House wants Boris to resign so the Queen can nominate an alternative PM, but a majority of the House may not yet be able to agree on who that alternative PM should be. Asking the Queen to nominate an alternative takes that decision out of their hands and avoids the necessity for rebel conservatives and Lib Dems to voted for Corbyn as PM - something they would very much rather not have to do.

They could then abstain on any votes of no confidence Boris & friends might table in the New PM probably allowing him to survive with a slim majority again not having to vote for Corbyn. MPs must be allowed to preserve their petty hatreds you see, and voting for Corbyn as PM is the kiss of death for any conservative MP (be they ever so rebellious) or the Lib Dems who are trying to set themselves up as the not Corbyn opposition.

Index of Frank's Diaries

by Frank Schnittger (mail Frankschnittger at hot male dotty communists) on Thu Sep 19th, 2019 at 07:45:31 AM EST
[ Parent ]
change of government: "the Queen can nominate an alternative PM, but a majority of the House may not yet be able to agree on who that alternative PM should be [since] Asking the Queen to nominate an alternative takes that decision out of their hands".

Just this evening the common wisdom is reported: "the monarch... is meant to remain above the political fray" unlike a duly, well, elected "government" sworn to secrecy in "dealings" with the monarch. Unless suspect motives of the PM and Privy Council meeting to consult the monarch are detected by paranormal actvities of MPs or journalists, and broadcast "displeasure".

A source quoted by the BBC said "it serves no one's interests" for conversations between the prime minister and the queen to be made public and "it makes it very hard for The Relationship to thrive".


Diversity is the key to economic and political evolution.
by Cat on Fri Sep 20th, 2019 at 04:04:55 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:

Occasional Series