Welcome to European Tribune. It's gone a bit quiet around here these days, but it's still going.
Display:
ICC | State of Palestine
2 January 2015, The State of Palestine acceded to the Rome Statute by depositing its instrument of accession with the UN Secretary-General. The Rome Statute entered into force for The State of Palestine on 1 April 2015.
16 January 2015, the Prosecutor announced the opening of a preliminary examination into the Situation in the State of Palestine
5 February 2021  Pre-Trial Chamber I's decision that the Court could exercise its criminal jurisdiction in the Situation.
3 March 2021, the Prosecutor announced the opening of the investigation into the Situation in the State of Palestine.
28 January 2020 Pre-Trial Chamber I issued an order setting the procedure and the schedule for the submission of observations on the Prosecutor's request.
17 November 2023 the Office of Prosecutor Office received a further referral of the Situation in the State of Palestine from South Africa, Bangladesh, Bolivia, Comoros, and Djibouti.
state.gov | Department Press Briefing - May 20, 2024
[...]
QUESTION: Okay. Second question, in addition to everybody else asked, is you said that Israel is not a member of the ICC, which is true. But also, and I don't know if you're aware of this or not, but Israel has supported the candidacy of Mr. Khan when he was elected in 2021, and they wanted him to be there. So, the fact that they actually endorsed him, they know there are some consequences, otherwise they won't have bothered in the first place. So, this is just to—I don't agree—to agree or disagree.
MILLER: It doesn't change the underlying—
QUESTION: It doesn't change anything.
MILLER:—the underlying jurisdictional question.
Rome Statute of the ICC, Part 2, Jurisdiction, Admissibility, and Applicable Law
QUESTION: Okay. So that my question is lawmakers agreed with you. They said the same. They repeated the same statement they issued in the White House. But they went further, and they said actually the decision is antisemitic. Do you agree that this decision is antisemitic as well?
MILLER: That's not an assessment that we have made or a conclusion we have drawn.
archive "Report to Congress under Section 2 of the National Security Memorandum on Safeguards and Accountability with Respect to Transferred Defense Articles and Defense Services (NSM-20)," 10 May  pp 18-32
QUESTION: Okay, and one last thing is on the issue itself, many international lawyers, very well known, different background, they said they found a reasonable ground that actually Israel has committed crime against humanity and crimes—war crimes. Does the White—Sorry, the State Department lawyers have a different conclusion, or did the—you have not reached this conclusion, or do you disagree with them? What exactly the difference between the lawyers who works at State Department and international lawyers who found different conclusion?
MILLER: So let me try to separate the ICC and answer this in two ways. One, when it comes to the ICC, we have a jurisdictional issue and then we have an issue with how this investigation was conducted. But to answer your underlying question about making that sort of determination, it is a question that we are looking at here. We have ongoing processes to look at Israel's use of U.S.-provided weapons, and those processes are ongoing. We have not yet reached final determinations.
[...]
by Cat on Tue May 21st, 2024 at 02:52:58 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Others have rated this comment as follows:

Display:

Occasional Series