The European Tribune is a forum for thoughtful dialogue of European and international issues. You are invited to post comments and your own articles.
Please REGISTER to post.
Good luck. Your friend's garden sounds mouth-watering! Nothing compares to just-picked sugar snap peas.
The title or deed - whatever its called in NC - will list all covenants and restrictions on the property. If it says no veggies then he will have to destroy his garden. The "architectural and landscaping standards" don't mean doo-doo unless the legal documents tie the property to those standards. Another way to get around them is to read everything associated with the covenants and restrictions and see if the HOA¹ has been conforming to the legal requirements.
In my experience the local judges and lawyers are financially tied to the local real estate agents. Stan can try and sue but he'll lose unless his connections are better than the HOA and local real estate people.
¹ HOA = Home Owners Association. In every case I know the committee members are bottom feeders. She believed in nothing; only her skepticism kept her from being an atheist. -- Jean-Paul Sartre
Actually the real answer to the problem is grow what you can grow. Brassics love shady areas and they are some of the best veggies one can grow for food value. She believed in nothing; only her skepticism kept her from being an atheist. -- Jean-Paul Sartre
The first thing your friend needs to do is file an appeal, or if there is no appeals process, file something in small claims court, anything to get a legal stay imposed so he doesn't have to tear up his food in the middle of the growing season. He can find ways to delay at least until harvest. He can use a technicality if neccessary -- he didn't get the original letter, for one thing. In most districts, if they don't send the notification by registered mail, it won't hold up in court anyway.
Second, he can nitpick them to death. If the regulations say no veggies and no herbs, he doesn't have to tear up his tomatoes because they're technically a berry and therefore a fruit. Containered plants can probably be considered separate from "the garden" and could also stay. If the regulations say "no food" or are more broadly worded so as to really imply no edible items can be grown, he needs to case the council members' houses and find out if any of them are growing rosemary hedges, or nasturtiums or other edible flowers.
Third, he probably has grounds to challenge the regulations on their face. Assuming this is Raleigh, NC, he needs to call up the law schools at Duke and UNC Chapel Hill and see if they have students around in law clinics over the summer who could advise him for free. I think the best bet is probably the Environmental Law and Policy clinic at Duke, but there's also the Community Enterprise clinic there. UNC has a Civil Legal Assitance Clinic too. Unfortunately, most of the clinics run only during the academic year, and I'm not sure whether they take direct clients without referrals anyway, but they might have some kind of staff around to answer questions during the summer. Can't hurt to talk to them, anyway.
More resources: North Carolina Justice Center Legal Aid of North Carolina LawHelp.org/NC
Just a couple of ideas to start off with. There are probably more avenues to pursue, including simple public opinion -- appealing to his neighbors. If the garden's pretty and useful, and he gets compliments on it, the odds are that somebody complained because of his bumper stickers (to state the obvious), but other neighbors could well be outraged if they found out he was being forced to tear it up. He could put a small sign in the garden saying that the neighborhood assiociation is trying to force him to dig it up, and asking for support. Maybe post a petition and/or the phone number and address of the responsible parties. Again, it isn't likely to hurt, and could help a lot.
Better read the fine print Your home is your castle, if the homeowners association says it's OK By Toby Coleman, Staff Writer It's a good thing the founding fathers didn't try to declare their independence in a subdivision clubhouse. They might have rejected King George III, but there would be no getting away from the real sovereign: the homeowners association. Amid all their enlightened talk of God-given rights, they would have had to grapple with rules on guests, noise and spittoons. Two centuries after the Declaration of Independence, a new generation of Americans is quietly submitting to the dos and don'ts of homeowners associations. The result is a widespread experiment with a largely unchecked private form of governance for which almost nobody has planned. In North Carolina alone, the number of homeowners associations has grown from 3,000 two decades ago to more than 15,000 today, according to the Homeowner Associations of North Carolina. In the Triangle, the number has soared over the same period from 481 to 2,915.
By Toby Coleman, Staff Writer It's a good thing the founding fathers didn't try to declare their independence in a subdivision clubhouse.
They might have rejected King George III, but there would be no getting away from the real sovereign: the homeowners association. Amid all their enlightened talk of God-given rights, they would have had to grapple with rules on guests, noise and spittoons.
Two centuries after the Declaration of Independence, a new generation of Americans is quietly submitting to the dos and don'ts of homeowners associations. The result is a widespread experiment with a largely unchecked private form of governance for which almost nobody has planned.
In North Carolina alone, the number of homeowners associations has grown from 3,000 two decades ago to more than 15,000 today, according to the Homeowner Associations of North Carolina. In the Triangle, the number has soared over the same period from 481 to 2,915.
As these organizations become more common, people are realizing that homeowners associations do more than organize ice cream socials, clean community pools and approve new fences. They have become mini-governments with the power to issue fines, assess taxlike fees and even foreclose on scofflaws who do not pay. Now, some say, it is time for the government to inject some checks and balances. State lawmakers are talking about studying HOAs and are even considering creating a state agency to issue permits to the community managers who help run them. Legal scholars are working on a model Homeowners Bill of Rights that they hope will limit HOAs abuses by requiring open board meetings, guaranteeing homeowners access to association documents and limiting when HOAs can foreclose on homes.
Now, some say, it is time for the government to inject some checks and balances. State lawmakers are talking about studying HOAs and are even considering creating a state agency to issue permits to the community managers who help run them.
Legal scholars are working on a model Homeowners Bill of Rights that they hope will limit HOAs abuses by requiring open board meetings, guaranteeing homeowners access to association documents and limiting when HOAs can foreclose on homes.
Hmmmm.
I think your friend needs to call up that reporter. But more important than talking to the reporter would probably be talking to one of the local opinion columnists who write about such issues and can actually advocate rather than we-report-you-decide. I don't know anything about the columnists at the paper now (they're all but one different than when I lived there), so I'm not sure who would be sympathetic, but this one has written about both zoning and the environment.
my suggestion: tell your friend to do a photo-essay on it and try and get some publicity on it, hell, diary it on kos, what would happen if those morons got 100,000 emails and phone calls, might they start to see how deep in the sand their heads are?
copy to grist, michael moore, and al (is it a bird, is it a plane?) gore...
make some waves, ruffle some feathers, make a big poster saying if you paved over your yard, it's all good, but growing food....should be a capital offence! call the radio station...
how dare he undermine the supermarkets' stranglehold on public food supply? what about the poor mexican aliens who will lose their illegal, repug-fattening work if people start to grow their own food?
osama's behind it....
good thing you can't make bombs from organic fertiliser.
this is right up there with 'no windmills on my skyline' and 'no panels on your roof' levels of vanity and delusion.
we're going down, but hell, we look great!
hey, maybe al gore's tv channel will come and do a reportage.
if your friend wasn't a supernice guy, he might even start countersuing saying rosemary plants bring down the neighbourhood, and he'll only rip up his veggies if the others comply-
dumb rules for one, dumb rules for all-
it's the dumbfuck nation way, how would homer handle it?
i'm surprised he got away with it the first year..
land of the free...did he make sure to only use monsanto-copyrighted seed?
well, there you go.
maybe spraying it all with plastic and calling it an art object will be a last resort. 'The history of public debt is full of irony. It rarely follows our ideas of order and justice.' Thomas Piketty
i'd totally grow chickens in my side yard if the neighborhood association didn't ban 'em.
by gmoke - Nov 12 7 comments
by Oui - Nov 28
by Oui - Nov 278 comments
by Oui - Nov 2511 comments
by Oui - Nov 24
by Oui - Nov 22
by Oui - Nov 2119 comments
by Oui - Nov 1615 comments
by Oui - Nov 153 comments
by Oui - Nov 1319 comments
by Oui - Nov 1224 comments
by gmoke - Nov 127 comments
by Oui - Nov 1114 comments
by Oui - Nov 10
by Oui - Nov 928 comments
by Oui - Nov 8
by Oui - Nov 73 comments
by Oui - Nov 633 comments
by Oui - Nov 522 comments
by Oui - Nov 321 comments