The European Tribune is a forum for thoughtful dialogue of European and international issues. You are invited to post comments and your own articles.
Please REGISTER to post.
To repeat: I believe we are at the very beginning of how Peer to Peer can change society - for the better. A lot of the old 'rules' for discourse still apply, but there are a lot of useful new ones being hammered into shape. These new ones are the rules of how a flock (many equal units) can become an organization - a flexible, non-linear, fast-reacting organization.
Frank S had many insightful and innovative comments in the course of these recent crazy discussions, and I hope he won't mind if I call him an 'old rules' guy. That means he's calling upon management pragmatism expertise.
His most insightful comment imho was that a lot more people than the FPs have an emotional investment, both as contributors and friends, in a site such as ET. For me that means one cannot fully invoke ownership rights for management. But these matters are hard to discuss, except in a respectful atmosphere such that the transition to a true distributed ownership is possible. It is a rather unstable feedback system - but, as I said, we are at the beginning, where theory comes up against practice. You can't be me, I'm taken
I want to do the best work possible. In the past 7 or 8 months I've spent considerable effort and money in upping my game. I don't know if it has been enough to avoid making a complete fool of myself, but I'll hazard the humiliation. ET's a good place for me to do this. "It Can't Be Just About Us"--Frank Schnittger, ETian Extraordinaire
PS a "best of the blogs" feature where you list some of the really good stuff you come across on your foreign policy travels could be a useful regular feature! notes from no w here
The links fall into several categories: blogs, news, journals/think tanks, and miscellaneous. Every link is related to this foreign policy thing I'm engaged in (it has quite taken over my life at this point but I still feel the need to put in a big effort.)
I wouldn't think of posting such a diary without including the links anyways...I'm a sharing kinda guy, you know. "It Can't Be Just About Us"--Frank Schnittger, ETian Extraordinaire
Europe was Doomed™
# 46 BC - Julius Caesar defeats Caecilius Metellus Scipio and Marcus Porcius Cato in the battle of Thapsus. # 1652 - Dutch sailor Jan van Riebeeck establishes a resupply camp at the Cape of Good Hope, which eventually becomes Cape Town. # 1917 - World War I: The United States declares war on Germany (see President Woodrow Wilson's address to Congress). # 1930 - Gandhi raises a lump of mud and salt and declares, "With this, I am shaking the foundations of the British Empire." Thus he starts the Salt Satyagraha. # 1994 - The Rwandan Genocide begins when the aircraft carrying Rwandan president Juvénal Habyarimana and Burundian president Cyprien Ntaryamira is shot down.
But you've got it. On April 6, 1994, an airplane carrying the Rwandan president was shot down by (it is said) missile at the airport in Kigali, Rwanda. Events quickly, very quickly, developed in one of the worst genocides of that bloody century. While the world watched and did nothing. "It Can't Be Just About Us"--Frank Schnittger, ETian Extraordinaire
I mean, you could be enjoying pancakes at the moment. "It Can't Be Just About Us"--Frank Schnittger, ETian Extraordinaire
Off topic, right off the bat...but then you're blogging for pretty much the same reasons I am. Or am I wrong about that? "It Can't Be Just About Us"--Frank Schnittger, ETian Extraordinaire
If it hasn't been done already.
This blogging business can give you a high and it's important to continue once you've gotten off that.
So, to your poll, which was a good idea, I answered to write about issues I care about, which is also why I blog in the first place.
Perhaps we should do a statistical analysis of the location and frequency of meta comments in comment stream. Someone is bound to flick the ball in another direction from time to time! notes from no w here
What I don't want is another flame war breaking out. "It Can't Be Just About Us"--Frank Schnittger, ETian Extraordinaire
I see blogging as a two way process - as a talking with an on-line community - so it can't just be about self expression or writing into a vacuum. It also has to be about meeting felt needs at some end of the universe. Right now the things which bother me are the economic and political melt-down in Ireland - so many people are losing their jobs; what I see as an ossification of the European project; and what I sense as a failure of "progressive cyberspace" in Europe to connect to the "real world" of opinion makers, political leaders, and popular culture. I am part of that failure. A whole generation has been let down - badly - and although I could see it coming, partly, I could do nothing effective about it.
The road to hell is paved with good intentions. Meaning well doesn't cut it for me any more, but political effectiveness when you have never felt comfortable within the political culture and don't have political skills is also not an easy task. So for the moment I play around with ideas, write a few LTEs and work for a few voluntary organisations. The blogging is becoming a distraction. Like a lot of people here I think it may be time to move on. No doubt others will join up to keep the place going if some people want to keep it going. A bit of turnover can be healthy. Blogging is supposed to be fun. When you stop enjoying it its a sign that you're past your sell-by date and its time to leave the fun to others.
I'll still be lurking occasionally and perhaps publishing if inspiration beckons. But the focus must increasingly be else where. notes from no w here
For me, it's a little different. My capacities have been grossly underused these past few years, and part of this whole project I'm into is about meeting this challenge I've set myself. Foreign policy gets my special attention because there's a real and pressing need for a rise in the level of public debate. I imagine that I'll be criticizing the America press quite a bit for the way issues are framed here. "It Can't Be Just About Us"--Frank Schnittger, ETian Extraordinaire
and what I sense as a failure of "progressive cyberspace" in Europe to connect to the "real world" of opinion makers, political leaders, and popular culture.
I tend to see it as two different trends coinciding and having interesting effects on each other. On one hand we have the real world leaders distancing themselves from their populations, shifting the window sharply rightwards. This trend has gone on since the 80'ies and has accelerated during the 00'ies. The EU project is suffering badly from this as a) EU-made-me-do-it is one of the more popular scapegoats and b) the EU structure is rather fluid and has a lack of public input.
In Sweden, one of the metrics indicating the abandonement of public consent is the number of members in the political parties and just to pull some numbers:
In 1979 there was 1 582 000 members in the political parties represented in parliament. About 19% of the population. In 1991 that number has shrunk to 625 000 or 7%. Last year with availeble data is now 2006 with 280 000 or 3%. (Members, Population)
The progressive cyberspace is the first pan-EU public space and as such is very interesting. It has little influence because there is little interest in listening, which is of course frustrating. From my experiences with the swedish pirate party I would say that blogs and other means are wonderous means of communication and discussion. You do not get a direct effect by a good argument, effects has to be forced through. Having good arguments and dispersing them are however crucial once you have activists handing out leaflets and organisers getting 10 seconds of airtime. It can also be used as means for organisation.
Again I will use Sweden as example. The FRA law was almost sneeked all the way through parliament. Through party organising (that would be pirate party - forum, irc, skype, IRL), wikis, action pages and blogs momentum was built until this was the main question in the swedish blogosphere. Then on the day of the voting 2000 gathered outside the parliament:
The interesting thing is that this happened without the old media (papers, tv, radio) catching on. Not that it was not tried, but as the narrative was not in pace the story could not break. Until there was 2000 people outside parliament that is, then the story became how this happened with blogs - blogquake was on of the terms. Law was passed tough, but the FRA law turned into the story of the year.
So my general tips for affecting change is organise, analyse the situation and find a path to what change you want to effect. Then work hard and expect to be patronised, lied about and not listened to by anyone who has power now. If people in power listened to reasonable arguments we would not be in this situation in the first place. Reformation is no tea party.
I am late to the general crisis/pity party here and not at all sure what it is about. Though I suspect it has a lot to do with the frustration of creating wonderous deconstructions, undressing the myths and prescribing good ways and not affecting clear political change. Over and over. If so I would like to point out that the stop Blair campaign worked, at least for the time being. I think more such campaigns could work if we formulate:
I suspect a lot of us (Europeans) are looking envious at the USA and the attention / influence blogs are getting there. There is nothing comparable in the EU. Maybe in some of the member states? I don´t know.
I do notice however that blogs even here in backwards Germany are starting to get mentioned in the news media sometimes. It´s a tiny step but I think US blogs have started in the same way years ago. :)
And the European Tribune is one of the few blogs trying to engage / inform Europeans from different countries. That is something precious and shouldn´t be lightly discarded.
To mention just an example. Your diaries about Ireland. You gave me more information about Ireland than the German media did in the past years. The same with Jerome and his economic and wind energy diaries. And several other diarists / front pagers too.
The point(s) I´m trying to make:
In the end though, I will have to respect your decision. Although I ask you (and all the others) to think about it. As I said above, on the one hand we seem to see a return to the (comfortable) nation state for the solution to the crisis. Which - on its own - unfortunately can´t solve the current economic problems. On the other hand I believe I see a slowly growing media awareness of blogs even in countries like Germany.
If you want to help Ireland and get the Irish point-of-view to an audience for example in Germany, I would respectfully suggest you shouldn´t stop posting diaries here. I don´t quite know where else you could publish an Irish opinion so cheap and get it read by other Europeans?
I don´t quite see how we can help Ireland, the EU or all of Europe by just disintegrating at the first time of economic troubles?
(Mind you, I´m not criticizing anyone personally. Each of you might have different reasons for thinking about leaving European Tribune. I´m just asking you to think about it.)
By "blog" I meant posting at ET, though if somebody posts at another site, the reasons they share with us here are perfectly valid for my purposes.
Thanks for making me clarify. "It Can't Be Just About Us"--Frank Schnittger, ETian Extraordinaire
Wel, it is true as a reflection of my personal experiences, and I suspect I've been to the same blogs others here have been to.
I can't speak for the FP team. I have some informed opinions, but do not think it proper to share them. Come, my friends, 'Tis not too late to seek a newer world.
Quite likely some of both. If Jerome and Colman, and whichever FP person wishes to call it quits, then let me say now that it has been a priviledge being here, and thank you all for that. "It Can't Be Just About Us"--Frank Schnittger, ETian Extraordinaire
I stayed:
Also, you can find good pancake recipes... "Dieu se rit des hommes qui se plaignent des conséquences alors qu'ils en chérissent les causes" Jacques-Bénigne Bossuet
I think the people on this site are the best one could ask for, both in terms of knowledge and decency. And the site offers a range of discussion unparalleled elsewhere in the blogosphere, from Jerome's right-on "Countdown" diaries to poemless's wickedly-brilliant "Odds & Ends" to DoDo's wonderful trainblogging to the many exciting adventures of Nomad to Frank's incredibly-enjoyable outside take on the 2008 election and his ongoing coverage of the economic crisis from Ireland. And much, much more (too much to name).
Shit, who needs the Beeb or the Indie?
And I still want to do a weekly economic news roundtable. I reckon we could do that with webcams on Skype or something along those lines. And it would certainly beat the hell out of those idiots on CNBC. Getting Mig and TBG to debate the merits of Frodo's "stress tests" would be worth it, alone.
I don't always -- hell, not even usually -- have something constructive to add. But I'd be much poorer without ET. Be nice to America. Or we'll bring democracy to your country.
I may be wandering into wacko territory here, but I think also I have this fantasy that European life is so much more intelligent and sophisticated than anything you can get off the shelf here, so it's a way to (maybe) experience that a little bit
And look at how wonderful the "flame wars" are! You can't beat this warm, tactful agonizing across several diaries, one of which doesn't even allow comments! Where else could you find anything like this.
I did get a huge kick out of the housing bubble blog before the bubble officially burst and before that actual meltdown last fall. Now that the mess has happened and everyone sees it, it just isn't any fun anymore. I guess it's fun to feel like you're in the know--hanging out with everyone who is not afraid to talk about the bubble that most people are pretending doesn't exist.
I think there is an element of that with ET--I feel like I'm hanging out, (more like observing from a perch on the rafters), at a place most people I know do not believe exists.
That is exactly how I feel about ET.
I think they should put this in quotes under the logo on the top left of the front page.
"A Place Most People I Know Do Not Believe Exists" Come, my friends, 'Tis not too late to seek a newer world.
but I realize that things can always take a turn for the worse, so I'll knock on blogwood. knock knock
(ducks)
ET is far tooo valuable to this, your species, than you might realize so PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE stop this "ET will stop ... stuff (I was going to say crap!)"
I will sober up. I will regret typing these words and posting them. I will wake up in 6 hours and think "Oh crap, Did I post THAT at ET? Oh NOOOOOOO!" Screw it! This is important crap and ET is GOOOOOOD STUFF!
Enough! They tried to assimilate me. They failed.
you are the media you consume.
I can understand the FPers' frustration and annoyance, as they have to deal with sometimes difficult debaters (why are looking at me like that ? :-)), worse, with a very small minority who accuse them of bias, ganging up, etc. My impression is they lean over backwards to avoid even the appearance of doing so. And, yes, of course they should be able to take part in discussion and passionately if they feel so moved.
It's natural and very desirable that people get passionate about things and then upset when others disagree - and the heat rises. It's healthy to want to defend your views and smite the unbelievers with logic and some - er - rhetorical flourishes :-) - one ought to be able to call a spade a bloody useless shovel from time to time. "Sticks and stones can break my bones..." - guys.
I like the rough and tumble of some British forums - there has been, just occasionally, some brilliantly scathing invective to savour on Lenin's Tomb - along the lines of: "Your comment reveals that the sum of your knowledge of theoretical physics would still leave a large void in the brain of a gnat." E.g.:
[Jenny] "All right, all right, Rob, but how would you propose a non-military solution to helping foreign countries in need aside from a slow working class revolution?" I would not bomb the crap out of them. That's not a solution I know. But, let us parse this slowly, for you seem to be a bit slow. Not bombing the crap out of someone is preferable to bombing the crap out of them. It may not be a solution to their indigestion, depression, financial problems, dictatorship etc - whatever ails them. Though it is a solution to the problem of having the crap bombed out of them - which is a serious problem. Moreover (and here you'll have to take a deep breath, because it gets a bit complex) bombing the crap out of them ACTUALLY TENDS TO MAKE THINGS WORSE. If they're poor they'll be poorer. If they're depressed, they'll be more depressed. If they have a dictatorship the dictatorship will gain support for opposing the nasty bombers. And, finally, they'll not like the country/army/regime that is responsible for the solution because they are BOMBING THEM. There endeth the lesson. Tomorrow we'll do fractions. http://leninology.blogspot.com/ Feb 21st
I would not bomb the crap out of them.
That's not a solution I know. But, let us parse this slowly, for you seem to be a bit slow. Not bombing the crap out of someone is preferable to bombing the crap out of them. It may not be a solution to their indigestion, depression, financial problems, dictatorship etc - whatever ails them. Though it is a solution to the problem of having the crap bombed out of them - which is a serious problem.
Moreover (and here you'll have to take a deep breath, because it gets a bit complex) bombing the crap out of them ACTUALLY TENDS TO MAKE THINGS WORSE.
If they're poor they'll be poorer. If they're depressed, they'll be more depressed. If they have a dictatorship the dictatorship will gain support for opposing the nasty bombers. And, finally, they'll not like the country/army/regime that is responsible for the solution because they are BOMBING THEM.
There endeth the lesson. Tomorrow we'll do fractions.
http://leninology.blogspot.com/ Feb 21st
The Tomb flourishes, despite regular doses of such bracing stuff.
CNN is STILL discussing the crash - yawn - in the meantime there must have been a million happy landings. Now they're listing other recent crashes, all two of them - obviously we need to ground all aircraft for checks and endless drivelling discussion on CNN - building fear where there is no justification - a bit like fear of occasional passionate dispute here.
We need to accept the Dionysian (puff for my diary :-)):
"It is no good casting out devils. They belong to us, we must accept them and be at peace with them"
D.H. Lawrence (British Novelist), Pheonix, 'The Reality of peace'
"Be still when you have nothing to say; when genuine passion moves you, say what you've got to say, and say it hot."
D. H. Lawrence Maybe it's because I'm a Londoner - that I moved to Nice.
Of course if one simply listed CNN's major reporting errors, they would be the first to scream that this needs to be seen in the context of the huge volume of their reports since 1980. Maybe it's because I'm a Londoner - that I moved to Nice.
I was always discontent with the state of news, interaction on the internet and the general format of blogs. There was really no form of rectification or commentary within the immediacy of an event until SCOOP came along. (In the seventies and eighties you could subscribe to obscure periodicals such as IF Stone's weekly, the Watchdog, I think it was called, that debunked Reagan, the Center for Defense Information Bulletin sponsered by Woodward and Newman. You could get great information out of the NYRB sooner or later, as well as a slue of other mags- but you had to be a dedicated nut.)
I discovered SCOOP at Dkos because of the Calipari assassination. By chance. Jerome and gilgamesh were handling the story but I had to wait 24 hours to post. I began to post as rom wyo but I soon moved on to Booman's Tribune because I prefered the pace there. And pace meant getting reactions, feedback, comments. This is important not for the ego high but because it gives the sense of an agora- sure a surrogate, but worldwide.
So when I caught on that Jerome had something in the works I was ready. (I recall the European Tribune went on net by mistake for a few hours through a link.Then there were all those flags clueing us in.) The project seemed made for the inter-nationals like myself, people who for a variety of reasons have visited and lived in many a place, many a nation and tend to have a worldwide view rather than the Dkos States-centric vision. So I've been here since day one, off and on, as # 46.
And I'll be here to the end. I'll check the lights are out. Leave me the keys if you want. I'll drop them in the mailbox.
Is this sensitivity to inferred insults and poorly founded statements a European thing? What is it like in other European blogs? From my American viewpoint, things are almost soporifically quiet in here--even during the most "violent" of disagreements.
In comparison, think of DailyKos, which has more than its share of stupid fights. Or, let me point you to another blog that I frequent*, http://www.nasioc.com/forums. This is fundamentally a car site, sponsored by Subaru enthusiasts, but their most popular forum is the Off Topic forum (at almost the bottom of the forum front page). OT is a general discussion area, and has attracted a wide audience for some not-so-clear reason. This site experiences high volume with a claimed maximum of 9025 maximum simultaneous users a few months ago.
Here's what passes for discourse on this blog: http://forums.nasioc.com/forums/showthread.php?t=1575413
Now I'm not going to argue that ridiculously ill-informed, biased, over-the-top arguments between twenty-somethings should be the yardstick against which ET is measured, but it sure seems to me that there is a bit of oversensitivity here...
What exactly is the problem?
* Why would asdf frequent such a blog? Because it's important for old geezers to keep in touch with the thinking and viewpoints of youngsters. There are useful discussions embedded in the noise....
A problem with that would be that if you get a few hundred replies then it takes a long time for the page to load...
(Before anyone gets their hopes up, this would probably mena rewriting some SCOOP code and I doubt there is enough interest for that. Just trying out the ideas.) Sweden's finest (and perhaps only) collaborative, leftist e-newspaper Synapze.se
High signal to noise ratio, in other words.
But most importantly, I know the regular contributors here well enough that I can extend the presumption of good faith. While that does not permit one to suspend good sense entirely, it does mean that I do not have to scrutinise each post for ulterior motives, as I would if I were reading - say - the comment thread on a newspaper article. And it permits me to read ambiguous contribution in the more favourable of the possible ways.
I would argue that the mutual presumption of good faith is what defines a "community." And, without wishing to play amateur psychologist, I think that the partial breakdown of this mutual presumption of good faith between the long-time contributors is what makes the flame wars here more painful (and more personal) than what their actual content (usually reasonably polite, by internet standards) would seem to justify on its own.
- Jake Friends come and go. Enemies accumulate.
by Frank Schnittger - May 31
by Oui - May 30 10 comments
by Frank Schnittger - May 23 3 comments
by Frank Schnittger - May 27 3 comments
by Frank Schnittger - May 5 22 comments
by Oui - May 13 65 comments
by Carrie - Apr 30 7 comments
by Oui - May 3114 comments
by Oui - May 3010 comments
by Frank Schnittger - May 273 comments
by Oui - May 2725 comments
by Oui - May 24
by Frank Schnittger - May 233 comments
by Oui - May 1365 comments
by Oui - May 910 comments
by Frank Schnittger - May 522 comments
by Oui - May 449 comments
by Oui - May 312 comments
by Oui - May 29 comments
by Oui - Apr 30273 comments
by Carrie - Apr 307 comments
by Oui - Apr 2644 comments
by Oui - Apr 889 comments
by Oui - Mar 19143 comments