Welcome to European Tribune. It's gone a bit quiet around here these days, but it's still going.

Condi with Merkel: Confessions of a Dangerous Mind?

by Saturday Tue Dec 6th, 2005 at 07:02:28 PM EST

Condoleeza Rice's visit to Berlin was much anticipated by us all here and by all people who want to know the facts behind the CIA "rendition" scandal. As far as I am concerned, I am glad to say: I am not disappointed. After her meeting with Rice, Merkel said that "the American administration has admitted this man has been erroneously taken." But after she left Berlin, Rice's staff members told a Reuters reporter that "we do not know what had crossed Merkel's mind" when she said that. Meaning: They accused Merkel of being either deaf or a liar. Nice start into the much-anticipated new US-German relationships, I would say.

This whole thing ain't over, as well as this diary. Click on read more and read more if you like!


One thing for sure: If Merkel wanted to ease the tensions in the US-German relations, she did not succeed. Which, in this case, is a good thing. I want to have a good relationship with a good US government, not with Bush's government. It seems that Merkel's and Rice's "misunderstanding" was the result of rising public pressure on the issue. WaPo:

In Berlin, questions about media reports concerning secret CIA prisons in Eastern Europe, CIA rendition practices and the Masri case dominated Rice's news conference with Merkel. The news conference in Berlin attracted dozens of reporters and 27 television cameras.

Facing an ACLU charge in the case of the abduction of Khaled Masri, Rice seemingly did not have any other choice but to switch to undiplomatic mode. Which in turn will foster coverage about CIA crimes and European leaders' complicity. This is a really nice example of how important it is to raise public pressure in a concerted way both in the US and in Europe.

Meanwhile, new German Foreign Minister Frank Walter Steinmeier admitted that he knew of Masri's abduction as early as June 2004. Now that two former ministers under the Schröder government seem to have had knowledge of the abduction in May and June 2004, it becomes more and more unlikely that Schröder himself or other members of the red/green government did not know. It seems inevitable that the first parliamentary investigation comittee (Untersuchungsausschuss) of the new legislative period will be about CIA "rendition" practices and what the former (and to a large part current) German government knew about it. FDP, Greens and Linke together have enough votes to request an Untersuchungsausschuss - and they will vote together on this issue. The Greens could be afraid of damaging Joschka Fischer, but in fact they do not have any other choice as an opposition party.

One more thought: The new diplomatic quarrel shows that the dissonances of the last years did not root in the personal Schröder-Bush-relationship. Neither was it founded on an alledged anti-Americanism by Schröder or the majority of Germans (opposing the war in Iraq, I had to defend my support of Schröder's anti-Bush/anti-Iraq war policy in several discussions against the allegation of supporting anti-Americanism). No one can accuse Angela Merkel of anti-Americanism. Today's events show: Cooperation with the Bush administration on an equal basis is not possible. Neither for Social Democrats nor for Conservatives.

Display:
This will be a major distraction for the new coalition government. Black-Red will be paralyzed until the truth comes out about possible German government complicity in the US rendition program. But maybe its a good thing (for most Germans) that implementation of the announced "reforms" gets delayed.

Dialog International
by DowneastDem (david.vickrey (at) post.harvard.edu) on Tue Dec 6th, 2005 at 07:43:39 PM EST
That would be a nice outcome, but I don't think so - I believe most of what we would like to know is already known (only Joschka Fischer's complicity is a big question, but one not affecting the current government in a negative way), and the German media is Atlanticist enough to let the case die in a few weeks (or even days).

*Lunatic*, n.
One whose delusions are out of fashion.
by DoDo on Wed Dec 7th, 2005 at 03:09:17 AM EST
[ Parent ]
One thing for sure: If Merkel wanted to ease the tensions in the US-German relations, she did not succeed. Which, in this case, is a good thing. I want to have a good relationship with a good US government, not with Bush's government.

Fully agreed. Fully agreed.

*Lunatic*, n.
One whose delusions are out of fashion.

by DoDo on Wed Dec 7th, 2005 at 03:07:01 AM EST
Today's events show: Cooperation with the Bush administration on an equal basis is not possible. Neither for Social Democrats nor for Conservatives.

Always the pessimist, I think Merkel could have learnt this years ago, so she may not do so even now.

*Lunatic*, n.
One whose delusions are out of fashion.

by DoDo on Wed Dec 7th, 2005 at 03:11:33 AM EST
Cooperation with the Bush administration on an equal basis is not possible.
Makes you wish for a press conference like the one in the film Love, actually. It is sad when our elected leaders do not live up to even Hugh Grant in a cheesy 'chick flick'.

A society committed to the notion that government is always bad will have bad government. And it doesn't have to be that way. — Paul Krugman
by Carrie (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Wed Dec 7th, 2005 at 04:02:07 AM EST
There seem to have been two sources of information about Masri's abduction: First, Otto Schily was informed by Daniel Coats in May 2004. Second, chanellor's office and foreign office knew because of Masri's lawyer Manfred Gnjidic who sent them a letter asking for support. In July 2004, Gnjidic received the federal government's answer assuring that everything would be undertaken to clear the facts. Apparently, this has not happened.

But the fact that there were these two sources also implies that even more politicians knew about the case. According to the Berliner Zeitung, the Bundestag's parliamentary control commission - which is responsible for controlling the government's intelligence agency (BND) - was informed about BND investigations into Masri's case in 2004.

Members of the parliamentary control commission were:

Volker Neumann (SPD), Hermann Bachmaier (SPD), Hans-Joachim Hacker (SPD), Erika Simm (SPD),  

Wolfgang Zeitlmann (CSU), Hartmut Büttner (CDU), Bernd Schmidbauer (CSU),

Hans-Christian Ströbele (Greens) and

Rainer Funke (FDP).

So, members of all factions in the Bundestag were informed. Even of Greens and FDP. If a parliamentary investigations really comes, it will be an awkward one.

by Saturday (geckes(at)gmx.net) on Wed Dec 7th, 2005 at 05:24:38 AM EST
This absolutely becomes (or should become) a major issue within German politics. A German government knowingly does not seem to act to protect a German citizen and then covers the affair up EVEN after it has come out into the press?

Merkel has one of these defining damned if you do, damned if you don't decisions.

She can damage the SPD and Greens by taking the position that these parties do not protect German citizens. The difficulty is that this line of argument will damage US-German relations even further. This issue could quickly spin out of control if she takes this approach. Even if she criticizes while giving the US a wink-and-a-nod, she is likely to be unable to control the public reaction.

OR

She can attempt to downplay the issue and consign it to a parliamentary committee which will study it to death. Also risky...and easy for the Links Party to portray all the other parties as consigning Germans to kidnappings and then lying about them.

by gradinski chai on Wed Dec 7th, 2005 at 11:14:52 AM EST


Display:
Go to: [ European Tribune Homepage : Top of page : Top of comments ]

Top Diaries