Welcome to European Tribune. It's gone a bit quiet around here these days, but it's still going.

Subsidiarity and Devolution in Action?

by DeAnander Fri Sep 28th, 2007 at 02:54:35 PM EST

Three newsclips to compare:

'Too late to avoid global warming,' say scientists

National governments stall and bureaucratise climate change response

C8ty of Austin TX sets most aggressive carbon reduction target in US


Disclaimer:  as y'all know I am not a "drown government in the bathtub" neolib by a long shot.  There is a role for national -- hey, for world -- governance.  But when responding to a crisis, flexibility, agility, mobility and local accountability are paramount;  and this is where devolution and subsidiarity come into their own.  Regional responses are more likely to be timely, effective, and intelligent than federal ones.

A city government is quicker off the mark and more responsive to residents than the ponderous machinery of the US, PRC, or EU.  It's notable that city mayors in the US are way ahead of the Fed in the carbon reduction game.  At the Fed level they are talking about which major US cities "we cannot afford to save" from rising sea levels [read whole article at risk of cranial detonation];  at the city level each polity is trying to protect its own place and people, which it does not regard as expendable.  

It is people's affection for their place -- be it rural or urban -- that makes them willing to relinquish some luxuries and privileges in order to preserve community and continuity -- to express solidarity with each other in the face of rapid change.  At the Fed level, layers and layers of bureaucracy and abstraction away from actual people living in actual places, there is no affection for the particular and all places are potentially expendable.  [cf NOLA, where the FEMA gang in several instances actually prevented aid from reaching residents.]

My $0.02 is that solutions (inasmuch as there are any) to the carbon/climate crisis are not going to come from the highly corrupt top drawer downwards, but upwards from the metropoles and the bioregions.  Top-down policy would help, if it were intelligent;  but the hugeness of scale of the big bureaucracies makes their response time slow, like the (probably apocryphal) stegosaurus who takes several seconds to realise that a smaller dino is biting his distant tail.

Agree?  disagree?  the energy and speed of local initiatives is just about the only hope I am holding onto.

Poll
where am I putting my last best hope for sane climate/energy policy and concomitant social change?
. the metropoles 27%
. the countryside 4%
. the established religions 0%
. big science 4%
. extra-terrestrial intervention 18%
. the UN 0%
. nation states 9%
. world government 4%
. the global south 9%
. hope? what hope? 22%

Votes: 22
Results | Other Polls
Display:
the economic damage is going to wreak far more havoc than rising tides.  And the media has spent far and away major efforts into boxing people into their little "left" vs "right" sophmoric political boxes to ever let them come to any rational agreement.

Hey, you think I'm giving up squat for Satan's government?  Guess again.

by Lasthorseman on Fri Sep 28th, 2007 at 05:34:09 PM EST
Policy decisions at all levels (local to global) seem absolutely necessary for emissions reductions to be successfull in due time to avoid catastrophes, which unfortunately may mean that "hope? what hope?" is one of the realistic choices.

The local level reacts first because local power is less out of our control but many decisions about infrastructure, regulation and funding for R&D are made at the national level. Seeing how the federal level in the US is trying to prevent California from enforcing its vehicle emissions standards, seems to indicate that at minimum a neutral fed will be necessary for some of the major local policies to come into effect.

by Fete des fous on Sat Sep 29th, 2007 at 03:58:32 PM EST
Seeing how the federal level in the US is trying to prevent California from enforcing its vehicle emissions standards

How are they trying to do this?

Truth unfolds in time through a communal process.

by marco on Sat Sep 29th, 2007 at 07:42:44 PM EST
[ Parent ]
I won't recall all the details but the fed argue that emissions standards are the domain of the Environmental Protection Agency (which ruled at the beginning of Bush Jr that CO2 wasn't a poison), and they also claim that emission standards are only possible through fuel economy which is the domain of congress (and just recently, congress refused to increase meaningfully fuel economy standards). The courts have so far ruled for the states but the states will need EPA approval and I have also a hard time imagining that push come to shove the Federal Society types on the supreme court will let corporations lose that battle.

Also, 12 states have followed California's lead, which represents over half the economy of the US, but I seem to recall that no more states could adopt this type of legislation because of some technicality. Although I am not sure how binding this is. These 13 US states would be the only ones, including Europe, with mandatory emission standards, although I haven't compared actual emissions in Europe and in the US.

The Union of COncerned Scientist, based in Cali, has quite a bit of info on the status and history of the legislation

by Fete des fous on Sat Sep 29th, 2007 at 09:01:45 PM EST
[ Parent ]
There is a limited amount of total information that any government can usefully handle ... when faced with information overload, a government "manages" more information by generalizing, stereotyping, pigeonholing and otherwise destroying detail.

Which makes the Federal role two-fold: specific regulation of those specific things that absolutely must be handled at the Federal level, and establishing general frameworks within which lower level decision makers ... individuals, cooperatives, municipalities, etc. ... can make the detailed decision for themselves.

As A Siegel often says, the focus of the latter is on making the right decision the easy decision.

I've been accused of being a Marxist, yet while Harpo's my favourite, it's Groucho I'm always quoting. Odd, that.

by BruceMcF (agila61 at netscape dot net) on Sat Sep 29th, 2007 at 10:57:41 PM EST
My perspective ... all of the above.

There are things -- such as electrical transformer regulations/standards -- that an Austin, Texas, or an individual citizen woul dhave a hard time driving.  Thus, the Federal (whether US, EU, or otherwise) matters.

Smart growth -- momentum will grow from smart communities. But, better transportation policy at the higher levels will enable.

But, some change will come from cities ... some from individuals ...

But, we need progress at all levels.

Blogging regularly at Get Energy Smart. NOW!!!

by a siegel (siegeadATgmailIGNORETHISdotPLEASEcom) on Sun Sep 30th, 2007 at 01:17:52 AM EST
most effective.  

We just missed destroying all human life by the end of the 20th century through UV radiation, and without global co-operation to quit dumping chloro-flouro-carbons into the atmosphere, we would have missed the window on that one.  (Actually we have not attained safety:  We are still emitting dangerous amounts of related ozone-depleters that might yet do us in--and there is no regulation in sight.)

But the highest level is no longer effective--it is hopelessly corrupt and getting worse.  This is no surprise:  Effective action would require re-thinking our deepest assumptions about civilization--about what it is and what it does.  But this rethinking we are unwilling to do.  Which in turn is reflected in our highest levels of political and economic organization becoming even MORE delusional and corrupt.  This is the standard pattern of a civilization in the process of failure and collapse, and while we may not know WHY this is what we are choosing, we can see the pattern and see that it IS what we are choosing.  

And if a few of us would choose otherwise--well, that is part of the pattern, too.  

Often--even usually--when collapse happens there are survivors, and that is where--assuming we don't attain the Easter Island or the planet Venus scenerios--things get interesting.  The survivors will certainly be organized locally, doing things that work.  Realizing that they will be local, and must work, we can guess what those things are.  Guessing what they are, we can begin to think locally in advance of the fact.  

Well, that is my perspective from the US.  If Europe can stave off privatization and the Anglo-American model, you have a chance at a slow collapse that is almost a soft landing.  But the trends are wrong:  You aren't staving them off, and if you don't, you will certainly follow the US to the bottom.  

Which brings me back to it:  The best way to have survivors is to maintain the biosphere, and the best way to maintain the biosphere is to stop doing what we are doing, but we will not stop before collapse itself stops us.  Planning ahead means organizing locally now.  Beyond that it is luck.  

The Fates are kind.

by Gaianne on Sun Sep 30th, 2007 at 09:44:40 PM EST
but we will not stop before collapse itself stops us

depressingly substantiating anecdotal article:  

When she moved to the United States from Germany seven years ago, Angela Neigl brought with her the energy-conscious sensibilities of life in Europe. You drove small cars. You recycled every can, lid and stray bit of household waste. You brought your own reusable bags or crate to the market rather than adding to the billions of plastic bags clogging landfills, killing aquatic creatures on the bottoms of oceans and lakes, and blowing in the wind.

    But, alas, there she was Friday morning, lugging her white plastic bags from the Turco's supermarket, like everyone else, figuring there was no fighting the American way of waste.

    "When I was first here, I brought my own bags to the market, but they would stuff the groceries in the plastic bags anyway. Finally, I gave up," she said. "People are very nice here. It's more relaxed. But the environmental thing is a little scary."

You could have learned a lot, I guess, about the politics of global warming from the lukewarm response President Bush received last week from skeptical delegates at his conference on climate change and energy security. But in the most micro of ways, you can learn plenty any day of the week at the Turco's or the Food Emporium in Yorktown Heights, the Super Stop & Shop in North White Plains, the A.&P. or Mrs. Green's Natural Market in Mount Kisco or just about anywhere Americans shop in Westchester County and beyond.

    And the lesson for now pretty much seems to be that no matter how piddly the effort, no matter how small the bother, well, it's too much bother.

    "I know," said Vicki Strebel, another Turco's shopper, when asked about bringing a reusable bag rather than taking home the throwaway plastic. "I should, but I don't. I'm sorry. I'm too busy. Things are too crazy. If I got the bags, I'd probably forget to put them in the car."

Industrial capitalism has promised its subjects a Life Without Bother:  a life like that of an aristo surrounded by slaves who whisk away every possible inconvenience before it impinges on the Master/Mistress's triumphal parade through this world.  Even if the consumer culture can offer only a cheesy ersatz version of royal luxury, it does offer mental and physical laziness on a grand scale:  no planning or forethought or ingenuity required, we can be as scatterbrained as we please and still function.  

And it looks like we've fully internalised the idea that work -- effort, planning, thinking, ingenuity, labour -- is somehow primitive and beneath us, that we are "better off" than our grandparents precisely because we are more helpless, dependent, ignorant than they were about our basic life support systems.  How else to explain the "difficulty" of remembering to bring a shopping bag to the store?

Epitaph for a civilisation:  It was all just too much bother.

The other day I was flipping through a mind-numbing consumer gadget catalog that had showed up in my mailbox, and my jaw dropped almost painfully when I saw this:

"Smart Shopper" -- an electronic gizmo that "organises your shoppung list" -- you speak into it and its primitive VR does a S2T recognising item names and, on demand, printing out a shopping list on thermal paper.  I think this customer comment says it all:  

This is the best "gadget" I have ever bought. I love it!! It really does make shopping easier and faster. The help site is great, and it was easy to order more paper. Which I had to do becaues I use it so much." -Gwen

Just what the affluent West needs -- a tool to make that essential patriotic activity of Shopping even Easier and Faster.  Wow, I had never realised what a gruelling chore it is to jot down a few items with a pencil on the back of a used envelope and stuff it in my pocket as I head out the door.  And how nice that it's easy to order more paper for the gizmo so you can spend even more money (Mr Kodak was right -- or was it Mr Eastman?)...

And people wonder why the elderly prematurely lose their memorisation and mental organisation faculties (from disuse, if you ask me) -- and then they market little gadgets like this:  Memory Trainer so that you can "improve memory and brain efficiency."  On the one hand we sell you the tools of mental atrophy, and on the other hand we sell you the tools of artificial stimulation.  Hey, it's a win-win situation.

The GNP, the GNP, the measure of our wealth --
infallible barometer of nations' economic health!
emerging countries all desire to raise that magic figure higher,
economists as one aspire to boost the mighty GNP!

so here's the plan:  abuse your land, exhaust the ancient soil --
buy some petrofertilisers, what the heck, there's lots of oil!
that makes things worse, now you need more, but every sale ups the score,
and what do you think farming's for, if not to boost the GNP?

half your population can be dying by degrees
of accident and murder and industrial disease;
their aches and chills and doctors' bills, the little pills they take until
the lawyers charge to read the will, it all inflates the GNP!
 -- Unfinished lyric, 1996 or so, by yrs truly

The difference between theory and practise in practise ...

by DeAnander (de_at_daclarke_dot_org) on Mon Oct 1st, 2007 at 08:56:53 PM EST
[ Parent ]
When she moved to the United States from Germany seven years ago, Angela Neigl brought with her the energy-conscious sensibilities of life in Europe. You drove small cars. You recycled every can, lid and stray bit of household waste. You brought your own reusable bags or crate to the market rather than adding to the billions of plastic bags clogging landfills, killing aquatic creatures on the bottoms of oceans and lakes, and blowing in the wind.

But, alas, there she was Friday morning, lugging her white plastic bags from the Turco's supermarket, like everyone else, figuring there was no fighting the American way of waste.

Yes, it's hard and it makes you a near outcast, unless you're in a sheltered environment such as a university campus.

We have met the enemy, and it is us — Pogo
by Carrie (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Tue Oct 2nd, 2007 at 02:58:29 AM EST
[ Parent ]
great lyric..

want help finishing it?

'The history of public debt is full of irony. It rarely follows our ideas of order and justice.' Thomas Piketty

by melo (melometa4(at)gmail.com) on Tue Oct 2nd, 2007 at 04:28:45 AM EST
[ Parent ]


Display:
Go to: [ European Tribune Homepage : Top of page : Top of comments ]