Welcome to European Tribune. It's gone a bit quiet around here these days, but it's still going.

Beware the Silver Bullet ...

by a siegel Wed Jun 18th, 2008 at 07:21:18 AM EST

Across the world, people are passing around with great excitement the news that there might be a bug that will create oil. And, not just bio-derived oil, but carbon-negative oil. One little bug, too small for the naked eye to see, and all our problems are solved!

Worried about anything? Forget it. Solved!

Or ...


Think about the problems this new biofuel could tackle.

Peak Oil? Forget it. Solved.

Global Warming? Forget it. Solved.

Export of dollars overseas for energy? Forget it. Solved.

Failure of the Big Three Automakers to adapt to a new world? Forget it. Solved.

Risks to American National Security due to funding both sides of the world? Forget it. Solved.

Average Americans' financial challenges in face of skyrocketing gas prices? Forget it. Solved.

My sleepless nights concerned about the above? Forget it. Solved.

Time to roll over and go back to sleep? Forget it. At least for now.

I am a techno-optimist (at least to some degree). I believe that scientists and engineers provide part of our solution paths forward. I believe (know) that there are tremendous things being developed in laboratories and garages around the world that will help us (the US) deal with the challenges we face. Yet (that "but"), I am leary of leaping upon the latest news, the item from the laboratory, the newest press release that screams "PROBLEM SOLVED" because, for whatever reasons, those miraculous answers all too often head back to the laboratory, turn out to be more difficult and costly than first described, and end up doing less than imagined.

This is the "Silver Bullet" solution concept, the idea that there is something magical out there, one single path toward solving all our problems. Silver Bullets are often thrown out when it comes to Peak Oil. When it comes to gasoline problems, for example, the Republican solution path is to feed what George W. Bush called our oil addiction and empty America's limited oil reserves through a crash program of DRILL! DRILL! DRILL! (Of course, they won't mention that this drilling program will have no influence on prices for years and perhaps only a 1-2 cent impact 15 years from now.)  Vinod Khosla has been making a lot of news (and making real investments) in the idea that biofuels will be the Silver Bullet for awhile now.   And, he might be right ... he might be ... But, what if he is not?  What if we (the world) seized upon this magical bug and said: full stop on everything else, problem solved?   If Khosla is right, problems solved and I can roll over and go back to sleep. If not?

The other idea is the Silver BB, that there are a myriad of responses and answers to our challenges. Each Silver BB (and silver speck of dust ... do you compost?) is part of the a larger, system-of-systems, holistic response to our global challenges (energy, water, global warming, food, economic development, etc ...).  And, if a Silver BB turns out to be a false path, to not be a precious metal but something less, then we continue with our other approaches, not having made a bet on that single Silver Bullet.

We must continue to tackle our challenges in a holistic manner.  We must tackle energy efficiency.  We must look toward paths for retiring coal from the electrical system. We must pursue renewable energy. We must look toward non-oil based transportation paths. We must ... approach our challenges in a holistic, system-of-system manner. And, we should do this in a flexible, (mainly) technology-neutral fashion, ready to incorporate (and even embrace)  Silver Specks of Dust that might turn into Silver BBs and that might ... might ... might ... turn into true Silver Bullets that change the game.

Will Khosla's bugs solve humanity's problems?  Maybe. And, I might even bet some bucks on it. But I won't bet our future.

Display:
'Bugs' are used to clean up pulp/paper factory water waste, which is put in outdoor pools and the waste water constantly aerated. Aerobic bacteria digest the biological waste. But this is simply an acceleration of a natural process by optimizing the environment of the bacteria.

You can't be me, I'm taken
by Sven Triloqvist on Wed Jun 18th, 2008 at 08:57:46 AM EST
I am not saying that this is impossible. I am not arguing that bugs might not be there that can help fill (part of) the liquid fuel demand.  I am not ...

What I am cautioning against is impassioned seizing on a single item (nuclear power; solar power; etc ...) as somehow the magic bullet that will solve all of our (mutual) problems.

Truth be told, this is generally not a problem in this highly literate and thoughtful community.  While still relevant (I think) for EuroTrib, far less likely to see massively positive responses to "this is the solution" posts here.  

Blogging regularly at Get Energy Smart. NOW!!!

by a siegel (siegeadATgmailIGNORETHISdotPLEASEcom) on Wed Jun 18th, 2008 at 10:57:30 AM EST
[ Parent ]
I still don't understand how this is carbon-negative.

Especially when you start massively turning organic waste (which counts as a carbon repository) and burning it.

There was a nuclear advocate around these parts who used to argue that growing trees, pulping them for paper and then dumping the paper into a landfill instead of recycling it is a form of carbon capture.

When the capital development of a country becomes a by-product of the activities of a casino, the job is likely to be ill-done. — John M. Keynes

by Carrie (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Wed Jun 18th, 2008 at 11:04:28 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Whatever happened to Cold fusion  - my favourite silver bullet of all time?

"It's a mystery to me - the game commences, For the usual fee - plus expenses, Confidential information - it's in my diary..."
by Frank Schnittger (mail Frankschnittger at hot male dotty communists) on Wed Jun 18th, 2008 at 11:12:39 AM EST
[ Parent ]
The bullet stopped cold...

When the capital development of a country becomes a by-product of the activities of a casino, the job is likely to be ill-done. — John M. Keynes
by Carrie (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Wed Jun 18th, 2008 at 11:16:30 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Just read up on in - apparently research is ongoing but hampered by lack of mainstream scientific acceptance because there is no theory to explain the results.  What I have not been able to find out is whether the observed effects are significant enough to create a worthwhile energy source in any case - it seems we are talking about very marginal unexplained effects - not an energy bonanza of any sort.

"It's a mystery to me - the game commences, For the usual fee - plus expenses, Confidential information - it's in my diary..."
by Frank Schnittger (mail Frankschnittger at hot male dotty communists) on Wed Jun 18th, 2008 at 11:32:25 AM EST
[ Parent ]
It wasn't me, but there are very good LCC Life Cycle Cost arguments for centralized burning of waste paper for heat/energy generation, using the latest non-carbon air releasing burner/scrubber technologies.

The energy balance costs of transporting waste paper for burning to regional centres beat de-inking energy costs for recycled paper (that can endure the process max 5 -7 times and still produce optically efficient paper.

The recent results of the major Finnish paper producers are nasty. They are in deep trouble. Meanwhile the unused fibre stock of plantation Finland grows by some 70 million cubic metres annually.

Trees anyone?

You can't be me, I'm taken

by Sven Triloqvist on Wed Jun 18th, 2008 at 11:16:54 AM EST
[ Parent ]
I am going to put 'words into their mouth', as I don't see this discussion there.

A hypothetical: The biomass is carbon rich, the bug transforms that biomass/carbon into liquid fuel but not with 100% efficiency. There is 'waste' biomass.  That waste biomass could be charcoaled and used as soil enrichment (re biochar). That biochar would be profitable (improving soil productivity) while capturing the carbon on centuries+ time scale. That sort of 'maybe' creates the potential for a carbon-negative lifecycle for this process.

Blogging regularly at Get Energy Smart. NOW!!!

by a siegel (siegeadATgmailIGNORETHISdotPLEASEcom) on Wed Jun 18th, 2008 at 12:16:44 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Reading the news article ... it sounds like "it is if it is". That is, if the feedstock is produced in a carbon negative way, its carbon negative (since it doesn't seem like a heat intensive process, and since something chemically similar to crude oil won't require the distilling of alcohol).

Obviously, if the feedstock is produced in a carbon positive, unsustainable way, that approach to producing the biomass is unsustainable.

Obviously, if you burn down rainforest to get the feedstock, that's not likely to be carbon negative ... the un-sustainability of cutting down rain forest for palm oil plantations for European biodiesel is just as unsustainable even if you double or triple the EROI or get ten times the yield per acre.


I've been accused of being a Marxist, yet while Harpo's my favourite, it's Groucho I'm always quoting. Odd, that.

by BruceMcF (agila61 at netscape dot net) on Wed Jun 18th, 2008 at 09:55:21 PM EST
[ Parent ]
It seems to me that this silver bullet is the same kind of Magic Thinking that is used in the U.S. medical system, where if you take the right pink pill (or blue or green one), all your symptoms will go away and you will be all better.

What people don't want to know is that the little pills are likely to "cure" the symptoms, but leave the underlying causes in place.

But we 'merricans do like our magic. Look at how many people believed the tales of how Iraq would greet the invading army with candy and flowers.

I'm all for oil-producing bugs, but until they hatch I'm going to continue finding ways to reduce my energy consumption and (I'm afraid it's already become a cliche) carbon footprint.

by Mnemosyne on Wed Jun 18th, 2008 at 07:54:58 PM EST
Just two questions about these bugs:  

  1. Assume it works.  What happens when the bugs get loose in the world--as is merely inevitable?  

  2.  Do not assume it works.  Rather, ask, can it work?  Potential energy is not like Wall Street accounting:  Every molecule has a fixed potential energy, which can be modified by its context, but that too is fixed.  So the energy to keep these bugs alive, and the energy for the oil they produce comes from . . . where?  

As far as I can tell, the most optimistic scenerio has farm waste which could be composted but won't be, instead fed to these bugs which then turn a fraction of the energy in the farm waste into oil that can be burnt.  

By the way, there is no way this can be carbon negative, or even neutral:  You are taking fixed carbon  (farm waste) and oxidizing some of it (to feed the bugs) so that the bugs will turn (most of) the rest of it into oil which you then burn (CO2 POSITIVE).  

This smells an awful lot like the guy (posted on ET) who was getting "water" to burn.  

Peak Oil is ultimately about arithmetic.  And the fact that arithmetic is against us.  There may be amelioration but there is no solution.  The numbers are right and we are wrong.  Dead wrong.  

The Fates are kind.

by Gaianne on Thu Jun 19th, 2008 at 01:21:21 AM EST
[ Parent ]


Display:
Go to: [ European Tribune Homepage : Top of page : Top of comments ]