Welcome to European Tribune. It's gone a bit quiet around here these days, but it's still going.

Role Models

by In Wales Sun Dec 19th, 2010 at 04:33:55 AM EST

A night in with the wine and two good friends created all sorts of conversations but one in particular was about role models - in the context of the gender balance in the Assembly and why that is important. Having a gender balance in the Assembly has helped to create a very distinct Welsh (and socialist) brand of policies in Wales. Research shows that women are more likely to instigate discussions on equality, children, older people, welfare. The issues are being put on the table, debated and policies formed.


I tend to argue that it isn't so much a women vs men thing but the fact that by having a gender balance you are more likely to have people from different backgrounds putting a range of perspectives forward. Women are still more likely to bear primary caring responsibilities for children, and relatives, more likely to experience disruption to their careers to take time out to care and so on. You've heard it all before.

But the point for me is that you have better diversity, not just a narrow field of middle class white men largely tumbling out of a small number of schools and universities, all from the same kind of background. I think the current policies coming out from the ConDem coalition show the dangers of a narrow political elite churning out proposals based on their ill-evidenced assumptions and ideology whilst being utterly out of touch with the reality of most people's lives.

But the other good thing about gender balance is that it provides role models. My generation saw Thatcher, fair enough, but largely you didn't see politics as a career that women went into. It was (and still is in Westminster) dominated by men. You didn't see many women CEOs, high profile, successful women to look towards anywhere. It's still a problem in business. But Welsh children growing up now will be used to seeing women politicians as being as much of a norm as seeing male politicians. You can't tell a girl who wants to go into politics that it isn't something women do, because look! There they are. Women AMs, women on the cabinet.

When I was growing up, I didn't know anyone else who was deaf. Nobody. I only met other deaf children when I was 9. Apart from one school I was at for 18 months, I was the only deaf child I knew. There was nobody to look to out there. I didn't have access to TV (not subtitled in those days) or radio. My mother only read the Daily Mail (think disability, think charity). When I was told that deaf children can't do drama, you should be a scientist in a lab - you won't have to worry about talking to people, you'll find it too hard to communicate, you have to be able to hear to do that, you can't do this... When I was forced to stay behind after school to learn to touch type because 'that is all you'll ever be capable of if you do get a job', who was out there to prove them wrong?

So different perspectives create better policies, but diversity of people brings with it role models, for others like them, whether it is gender, background, disability, ethnicity, geography.

It is a fallacy to say that if I can do the things I've done, so can any other deaf child coming after me because poverty of opportunity and access coupled with low expectations does huge damage to those who do not have the internal resources to overcome external barriers. But perhaps I can influence change and at the same time be a role model to encourage others to increase their expectations of themselves, to have the strength to defy what society pins on them and to find their own self-worth.

Display:
My long-standing conviction is that men and women are indeed different, and that women's values are superior to men's, statistically speaking.

But perhaps this is just deep-seated misandry on my part (or philogyny?)?

Another theory springs to mind, sparked by the "politicians are psycopath" meme, or factoid, irresponsibly spread by Sven the other day.

Where sexual parity is imposed in a given political system, you have a sudden vacuum. Every party or faction suddenly needs to find women to fill eligible positions in their lists. They often actually have to go out and recruit them, lacking enough female activists. This does indeed mean that they tend to be selected from a wider range of backgrounds than the male cadre.

So, often, the women who are elected have not been submitted to the years of internal competition for eligible positions. Their male equivalents are not their running mates, but those who gave up in disgust years ago, sick and tired of the manoeuvring and infighting for the interesting jobs.

According to this theory, you have therefore, among elected women, a much lower percentage of psychopaths than are to be found in the population of elected men.

Just a theory.

It is rightly acknowledged that people of faith have no monopoly of virtue - Queen Elizabeth II

by eurogreen on Sun Dec 19th, 2010 at 12:56:37 PM EST
eurogreen:
My long-standing conviction is that men and women are indeed different

Like women being better then men at math? Common wisdom in Iran according to a swedish-iranian I know.

eurogreen:

Where sexual parity is imposed in a given political system, you have a sudden vacuum. Every party or faction suddenly needs to find women to fill eligible positions in their lists. They often actually have to go out and recruit them, lacking enough female activists. This does indeed mean that they tend to be selected from a wider range of backgrounds than the male cadre.

So, often, the women who are elected have not been submitted to the years of internal competition for eligible positions. Their male equivalents are not their running mates, but those who gave up in disgust years ago, sick and tired of the manoeuvring and infighting for the interesting jobs.

According to this theory, you have therefore, among elected women, a much lower percentage of psychopaths than are to be found in the population of elected men.

Interesting, but only holds for the period of imposing gender balance. As soon as it is established as a system women has to fight their way up against other women.

Sweden's finest (and perhaps only) collaborative, leftist e-newspaper Synapze.se

by A swedish kind of death on Mon Dec 20th, 2010 at 02:32:36 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Like women being better then men at math?

Figures from Scandinavia suggest that under conditions of equality there isn't much difference as far as math goes: They do better than men in Iceland, but very slightly worse in Sweden and Norway.

by gk (gk (gk quattro due due sette @gmail.com)) on Mon Dec 20th, 2010 at 04:41:55 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Right now, the political classes of left and right have far more in common with each other than they do with us, having mostly attended the same school, university, internship. In terms of economic policy of cosseting the rich and screwing the poor is there any real difference between ConDem and NuLab ?

I would suggest that, once institutional and cultural sexism is gradually overcome, the women who become politicians will be seen as having far more in common with their male counterparts than they do with us as well. Whatever one feels about the value of women in parliament, those that go there will still have sympathies and priorities that are unfathomably alien to the rest of us.

keep to the Fen Causeway

by Helen (lareinagal at yahoo dot co dot uk) on Mon Dec 20th, 2010 at 04:50:15 PM EST


Display:
Go to: [ European Tribune Homepage : Top of page : Top of comments ]