Welcome to European Tribune. It's gone a bit quiet around here these days, but it's still going.

Sarkozy: Enemies Ahoy!

by afew Fri Feb 10th, 2012 at 04:21:43 AM EST

Over the last two weeks, the not-yet candidate whose candidature is supported by Angela Merkel, has nailed his colours to the mast: hard over to the right. First act, two Sundays ago with his six-channel TV spectacular, he announced that France would adopt the policies that have done so well for Germany, including an increase in VAT of 1.6% and the usual "necessary reforms" (in other words, reduce labour costs). Now, to appear in the magazine of the UMP's house newspaper, Le Figaro, he comes out with more bold plans: he will hold a referendum on the questions of whether foreigners should be more easily thrown out of the country or not, and whether the long-term unemployed should be forced into training and/or work, or not.

Shorter Sarkozy: I'll bring your wages down, but I'll offer you scapegoats.


The not-yet-candidate's campaign is built on an appeal to the popular right - Le Pen's electorate - and the traditional authoritarian right. So, along with the finger-pointing at the shirkers unemployed and the job thieves foreigners, he comes out in the Fig Mag in favour of "values" that include opposition to gay marriage and euthanasia, and can be summed up in the watchword (already used in 2007) Travail, Responsabilité, Autorité (the usual playing around with historical symbols: he could just as well put Famille instead of Responsabilité, since he and the UMP are apparently the last rampart against Socialist attacks on the Family, though Patrie would smell too strongly of mothballs).

As usual for Sarkozy, there's plenty of smoke billowing about. He is not a candidate and these are not proposals. He is the Head of State (to be used in UMP talking points in place of President of the Republic) and he is announcing what he intends to do. After the elections, of course.

What's the sense in all this? Not much. After a decade (half in government, half as president), Sarkozy has nothing to show for it - or rather, since polls show that the French place purchasing power and employment way at the top of their list of worries, all he has to show is negative. So he can only desperately steer the discussion away from anything other than his fake achievements as Saviour of the euro and Co-prince of Europe with the Kanzlerin, a set of wedge issues puffed up as "values", and the designation of enemies. The very fact that he is tacking to the right (apart from natural inclination) is evidence that he has no other room for manoeuvre. Whether Marine Le Pen is on the ballot or not, he is reduced to pleasing her electorate.

This should improve François Bayrou's flagging poll performance (from the mid-teens to 10% in a few weeks) by opening up the centre-right terrain. Meanwhile, François Hollande seems to be lapping it up. Amused, he asked if there couldn't also be a referendum on the VAT rise. And reminded his rally audience that the "next referendum" is in May with the second round of the presidential election. Hollande is currently polling in the low thirties for the first round, and is stable at 57.5% in the run-off.

So, fear of the world and of enemies without and within, scapegoats, penance for debt-guilt, authority. Can Sarko win more than 50% of the French electorate with that? It's his only hope, and it's a slim one.

Display:
Results from the different pollsters can be consulted at Sondages en France.
by afew (afew(a in a circle)eurotrib_dot_com) on Fri Feb 10th, 2012 at 04:27:29 AM EST
Marine Le Pen at almost 20% – horrible... Also, why are there parallel polls with or without Le Pen? A third question: do pollsters have known party allegiances and resulting biases?

*Lunatic*, n.
One whose delusions are out of fashion.
by DoDo on Fri Feb 10th, 2012 at 05:43:22 AM EST
[ Parent ]
The "with and without Le Pen" polls refer to the possibility that she might not be on the ballot.

Every candidate needs 500 signatures from elected officers (from MPs down to mayors of rural villages with a few dozen inhabitants). Every five years, the UMP tries to lock out Le Pen (père ou fille) by exhorting their members not to sign. More significantly, the signatures are published, and many are unwilling to back her publicly.

In the past, it has been alleged that the UMP has handed over the requisite signatures after back-room dealings; and I suspect that this will happen again. Sarko desperately needs Le Pen's voters in the second round (currently, according to polls, he would only get 40%).

It is rightly acknowledged that people of faith have no monopoly of virtue - Queen Elizabeth II

by eurogreen on Fri Feb 10th, 2012 at 06:06:29 AM EST
[ Parent ]
I note that most candidates get a bump without Le Pen. It would indicate to me that most of her voters abstains if she is not in the race. Or at least that they say they will abstain.

Sweden's finest (and perhaps only) collaborative, leftist e-newspaper Synapze.se
by A swedish kind of death on Fri Feb 10th, 2012 at 07:07:57 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Hollande is on 33 without Le Pen, which is little more than his usual score over the past few weeks. Sarkozy is the one who gets the big bump. But it is quite impossible to know how Le Pen and the FN would lead their electorate - no doubt into revolt, if she were denied the chance to be candidate.
by afew (afew(a in a circle)eurotrib_dot_com) on Fri Feb 10th, 2012 at 09:06:43 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Though I see a couple of other polls without Le Pen, where Sarko doesn't get that bump. And in one, Hollande gets 37%.

The IFOP poll where they were level pegging at 33% got more media attention, no need to explain why.

by afew (afew(a in a circle)eurotrib_dot_com) on Fri Feb 10th, 2012 at 09:22:57 AM EST
[ Parent ]
I just want to say that this "500 signatures from elected officials" thing is one of my very favorite things about the French political system.  It is genius and while partly effective due to the nature of the French government I do think it could translate elsewhere.
by paving on Mon Feb 13th, 2012 at 12:34:50 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Officially, pollsters don't have party allegiances. As to bias...

Jean-Luc Mélenchon sued one of the pollsters (don't recall which, it doesn't matter) to claim public information on their methods of reworking the raw poll results (by which this pollster credited him with only 3%). The court rejected his suit this week on grounds it was a "trade secret". He is appealing the judgement.

by afew (afew(a in a circle)eurotrib_dot_com) on Fri Feb 10th, 2012 at 09:15:38 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Isn't there a political dissonance between "everything to save the Euro" and a hard right course opening a void that is bound to be filled?
by oliver on Sun Feb 12th, 2012 at 04:08:23 AM EST
[ Parent ]
I'd say the discourse is "I Sarko (with Merkel) have saved the euro. I am your statesmanlike defence against disaster."

The "necessary ajustments" are under the heading "we are aligning with Germany, an historic opportunity for France".

But the populist hard-right pandering, you're right, doesn't fit with this stately posture. And the void is being rapidly filled by a reinvigorated Bayrou who has categorically rejected Sarko's referendum proposals, and can hope to pull votes off Sarko's centre-right flank and become the main rightwing candidate. And by Hollande, who does not need to move from his centre-left positioning to pick up some other centrist votes.

by afew (afew(a in a circle)eurotrib_dot_com) on Sun Feb 12th, 2012 at 04:20:56 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Of course, Pétain could have lined up all three of the above elements of discourse - but in an authoritarian state with no elections and an occupying German army.
by afew (afew(a in a circle)eurotrib_dot_com) on Sun Feb 12th, 2012 at 04:27:27 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Which may be why "Les Guignols de l'info" showed Sarkozy presenting his great plan of alignment on Germany and bragging at having secured a more or less independent zone in the south, covering a third of the territory (with all the best sites, such as St Tropez), where thanks to his brilliant negociations, French could remain the official language.

Earth provides enough to satisfy every man's need, but not every man's greed. Gandhi
by Cyrille (cyrillev domain yahoo.fr) on Sun Feb 12th, 2012 at 04:38:46 AM EST
[ Parent ]
I missed that. Haven't seen the Guignols in a while, I really dislike Le Grand Journal.
by afew (afew(a in a circle)eurotrib_dot_com) on Sun Feb 12th, 2012 at 05:41:59 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Only saw it on the web -because it was on the same day that the joke against Spanish sportsmen that got Spain in a rage.
I thought that it was a great way to put it.

Earth provides enough to satisfy every man's need, but not every man's greed. Gandhi
by Cyrille (cyrillev domain yahoo.fr) on Sun Feb 12th, 2012 at 08:00:30 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Please explain.

"Life shrinks or expands in proportion to one's courage." - Anaïs Nin
by Crazy Horse on Sun Feb 12th, 2012 at 09:25:10 AM EST
[ Parent ]
The doping scandal or the south part of France? I'll presume it's the latter.

Well, Sarkozy (or rather his muppet -it's a muppets program) was shown explaining that he had not needed to give any quid pro quo for Merkel's backing, only that she reckoned he was the only one able to lead the country. Then the interviewer retorts that the rumours are that France had to agree to most or all of Germany's requests.
Then Sarkozy says "not at all. Our country remains as free and independent as it has always been. Well, for the most part anyway." and goes on to show the map, adding that Germany does indeed take control of the northern economic regions, but that the Southern zone remains under French control and, thanks to his great negociating skills, we'll still speak French there. The map is clearly that of the occupied/free zones during the second world war.

It starts at 0:50 in the following video
Guignols 7/02/12

Earth provides enough to satisfy every man's need, but not every man's greed. Gandhi

by Cyrille (cyrillev domain yahoo.fr) on Sun Feb 12th, 2012 at 10:31:19 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Here's the correct video link.
The piece was referring to this (1940-1942):
by Bernard (bernard) on Sun Feb 12th, 2012 at 10:44:10 AM EST
[ Parent ]
For this to make sense swing voters would have to care about the Euro in a positive sense. Do they?
by oliver on Wed Feb 15th, 2012 at 08:26:38 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Rather, they are scared of the disaster that a collapse of the euro might bring.

It is rightly acknowledged that people of faith have no monopoly of virtue - Queen Elizabeth II
by eurogreen on Wed Feb 15th, 2012 at 09:02:37 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Scared enough to accept a certainly diminished independence to avoid a potential danger?
by oliver on Wed Feb 15th, 2012 at 10:13:05 AM EST
[ Parent ]
That depends on whether they buy the "There Is No Alternative" Merkozy meme.
The fact that there is a slightly more rational, unscary, social-democrat alternative on offer makes it a hard sell, however.

It is rightly acknowledged that people of faith have no monopoly of virtue - Queen Elizabeth II
by eurogreen on Wed Feb 15th, 2012 at 10:39:13 AM EST
[ Parent ]
The polls seem to be quit good for Hollande. A result in the low thirties in the first round would be a better result then either Royal or Sarkozy got in 2007.
by IM on Fri Feb 10th, 2012 at 05:33:20 AM EST
I think the really impressive thing so far is the extent to which Mme Merkel is attempting to throw her weight behind the candidat sortant.

I'm watching this development with as much curiosity as bemusement, suspecting this will be counterproductive, ultimately. Especially if things blow up in Greece, which is pretty likely at this point.

The Hun is always either at your throat or at your feet. Winston Churchill

by r------ on Fri Feb 10th, 2012 at 07:34:36 AM EST
Is Hollande encouraging her to intercede? It would be a good move.
by Upstate NY on Fri Feb 10th, 2012 at 10:38:10 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Hopefully contraproductive. Hannelore Kraft, PM of Northrhine-Westphalia and deputy chairman of the federal SPD, said that Merkel's 'campaign help' for Sarko will rather help the Socialists, and the SPD will give local campaign support to Hollande as consequence. (Did that feature in French media, or only Sarko's praise for Schröder?)

*Lunatic*, n.
One whose delusions are out of fashion.
by DoDo on Fri Feb 10th, 2012 at 10:48:08 AM EST
[ Parent ]
It was reported, but predictably little.
by afew (afew(a in a circle)eurotrib_dot_com) on Fri Feb 10th, 2012 at 11:22:14 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Thanks to whoever front-paged this. I lost my connection for several hours no doubt owing to snow and ice, but it now seems to be repaired.
by afew (afew(a in a circle)eurotrib_dot_com) on Fri Feb 10th, 2012 at 09:03:42 AM EST
You didn't mention cher Monsieur Guéant (Sarkozy's right hand) who is sounding more and more like a real Nazi and was called out as such, two days ago, by the MP from Martinique.

In fact, if you look at his photo he could have been a great character actor in the 1940's as a Nazi funtionaire.

http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Claude_Gu%C3%A9ant

Hey, Grandma Moses started late!

by LEP on Fri Feb 10th, 2012 at 10:31:30 AM EST
I try not to judge people by how they look but how they behave and what they do.  
by stevesim on Fri Feb 10th, 2012 at 10:42:55 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Well knock yourself out checking on what Guéant behaves and does.
by afew (afew(a in a circle)eurotrib_dot_com) on Fri Feb 10th, 2012 at 11:23:08 AM EST
[ Parent ]
oh, I know what he says.  I reported it here on Sunday.

However, I don't think anyone "has a face of a Nazi collaborationist fonctionnaire".  

by stevesim on Fri Feb 10th, 2012 at 12:18:42 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Sometimes looks and mannerisms divulge personality.

Hey, Grandma Moses started late!
by LEP on Fri Feb 10th, 2012 at 12:21:03 PM EST
[ Parent ]
like I said, better to judge a person by their actions and their speech then by their looks.  because judging by their looks is what the Nazis did.
by stevesim on Fri Feb 10th, 2012 at 12:44:48 PM EST
[ Parent ]
I don't disagree with you but when I look at this guy something in my gut says, " this guy's a Nazi." Now I wouldn't go exterminating him because of my emotional gut feelings, which is what the Nazis did.

As it is, Guéants' history and current actions make my gut seem quite right. I agree, my gut would not always be right but it's uncanny how often gut feeling are.

Hey, Grandma Moses started late!

by LEP on Fri Feb 10th, 2012 at 12:57:04 PM EST
[ Parent ]
I see someone who looks a lot like a lot of socialists and communists I know.  
by stevesim on Fri Feb 10th, 2012 at 01:02:29 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Well, if the far right ever takes over, you might not want to get too close to them, or very close to them, dependig on their position ;)

Hey, Grandma Moses started late!
by LEP on Fri Feb 10th, 2012 at 01:08:13 PM EST
[ Parent ]
sorry, I don't understand.  my friends would suddenly become dangerous?
by stevesim on Fri Feb 10th, 2012 at 01:16:46 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Im going to stop now because this not important conversation is getting too long. I do agree with you, however on the subject of acupuncture ;)

Hey, Grandma Moses started late!
by LEP on Fri Feb 10th, 2012 at 01:29:04 PM EST
[ Parent ]
sorry, I did not get that either.  

acupuncture?  I am studying acupuncture but don't see how it is relevant to the issue at hand.

by stevesim on Fri Feb 10th, 2012 at 01:31:47 PM EST
[ Parent ]
I am just trying to say we don't disagree about everything.

Hey, Grandma Moses started late!
by LEP on Fri Feb 10th, 2012 at 01:43:11 PM EST
[ Parent ]
I just re-read one of your comments.
by stevesim on Fri Feb 10th, 2012 at 01:44:57 PM EST
[ Parent ]
My grandmother had a saying that people above 40 are responsible for their faces. Faces change with age and that is not unrelated to frequent expressions on that face.

*Lunatic*, n.
One whose delusions are out of fashion.
by DoDo on Fri Feb 10th, 2012 at 03:06:03 PM EST
[ Parent ]
With all due respect, your grandmother was wrong.

I have seen very kind people who were victims of very difficult conditions that had the hardest, nastiest faces you could imagine, and vice-versa.  The politicians in the USA are a case in point -  a lot of the value put on looks is reflected in the political arena in the USA more than other countries, with the result we are all aware of.  And, of course, there's Hollywood and the entertainment industry.  They aren't exactly Mother Theresa, even those who haven't had any cosmetic procedures.  

I myself look like shit some days, and look amazingly good the next. I like to think that what I deserve is what I worked to earn, not how I look on a particular day.

by stevesim on Fri Feb 10th, 2012 at 03:26:38 PM EST
[ Parent ]
My grandmother was over-generalising, of course, but your equation with the Nazis dismissed non-genetic origins of looks entirely.

*Lunatic*, n.
One whose delusions are out of fashion.
by DoDo on Fri Feb 10th, 2012 at 03:49:11 PM EST
[ Parent ]
no, I did not mean genetics when I meant that the Nazis judged on looks.  they were definitely the ultimate practioners of style over substance.
by stevesim on Fri Feb 10th, 2012 at 04:00:18 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Now that's a rather superficial take on Nazism itself...

*Lunatic*, n.
One whose delusions are out of fashion.
by DoDo on Sat Feb 11th, 2012 at 12:01:40 PM EST
[ Parent ]
I disagree in general with Nazi parallels, not for reasons of personal morality or political correctness, but because I think they are misleading: we are not living the '20s and '30s over again (that doesn't mean we have nothing to learn from that period of history, but that most of the time calling people Nazis is fairly useless rhetoric). So I'm not going to say Guéant looks like a Nazi.

But it seems to me you are mixing up matters of public and private image. The French Interior Minister is not one of your friends or acquaintances, or one of the people you have met or may meet in everyday life (or you yourself, as you may look from one day to the next), where I don't think anyone would disagree that it is better to refrain from judging on appearances. Mr Guéant is a public figure who projects a public image, has powerful means of doing so, and is responsible for that image. That image includes his facial expressions, body language and his overall "look" when in public before the cameras.

Currently, he has moved into the spotlight by his public declarations, and there can be little doubt as to the image he wishes to convey. Here for example is a screen grab from the Nouvel Obs main page at the time of writing:

Similar pictures can be seen everywhere in the French media, and they are not the result of sneak "candid" shots or paparazzi work, they are the very image Claude Guéant wishes to project of himself through the mass media to the French people - the image of an obdurate, hardline authoritarian. And that image is deliberately pitched to a far-right electorate.

The private morality of everyday existence by which we choose not to judge people on their looks doesn't apply to the overblown media image that it is the privilege of powerful individuals to project. I don't know Guéant, don't wish to, but I see his face and manner on TV, in the press, on Internet, and I know the message they convey. As the Obs headline says, he's not a Nazi, but...

by afew (afew(a in a circle)eurotrib_dot_com) on Sat Feb 11th, 2012 at 11:57:33 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Since this is some way downthread, the above comment responds to:

stevesim:

I try not to judge people by how they look but how they behave and what they do.
by afew (afew(a in a circle)eurotrib_dot_com) on Sat Feb 11th, 2012 at 12:00:16 PM EST
[ Parent ]
I didn't mention that Guéant fired the first shot in this ultra-right campaign by his speech on the unequal "value" of civilisations. Plainly flattering the civilisation-clash narrative and ostracising Muslims.
by afew (afew(a in a circle)eurotrib_dot_com) on Fri Feb 10th, 2012 at 11:28:00 AM EST
[ Parent ]
I reported that on Sunday in the open thread.

He still doesn't look like a collabo.

by stevesim on Fri Feb 10th, 2012 at 01:03:38 PM EST
[ Parent ]
My comment contains no observation on Guéant's appearance. It concerned an element I could, perhaps should, have included in my diary (whether you commented on it elsewhere or not).
by afew (afew(a in a circle)eurotrib_dot_com) on Sat Feb 11th, 2012 at 03:47:22 AM EST
[ Parent ]
According to the 1st of August 2008 law on "rights and duties of job seekers", when registering at the employment center (Pôle Emploi), the job seeker defines - together with a consultant from Pôle Emploi - her/his personalized plan of access to employment (Plan Personnalisé d'Accès à l'Emploi - PPAE), which is updated every three months. The PPAE defines the characteristics of the kind of job sought by the job seeker: qualifications, type of contract (permanent or fixed-term, full or part-time), expected wages, desired geographical area...

On this basis are offered job opportunities that match these criteria and which are considered "reasonable offers of employment" (Offre Raisonnable d'Emploi - ORE). The refusal "without legitimate cause" of two ORE, leads to the suspension for a period of two months, the payment of the unemployment benefits received by the job seeker.

The definition of the ORE evolves over time: when the job seeker has been registered for more than three months, a job offer compatible with his qualifications and skills and paid up at least 95% of his previous salary is considered an ORE. This rate decreases to 85% after six months.

Past 6 months of unemployment, another criterion is added. Is considered ORE a job offer which implies a transit time of one hour maximum or a distance of up to 30 kilometers between the home and the workplace. These same criteria are retained after one year of registration, but the wage requirement is further downgraded: the ORE shall be paid at least at the same level as the unemployment benefits.

The refusal of training can also lead to the suspension of payment of the benefits first for a fortnight and then, in case of repeated breaches, the suspension can last from one month to six months.

This law has been heavily criticized by the unions, particularly with regard to sanctions against recipients of unemployment benefits who refuse two job offers so-called "reasonable". The unions feel that this requirement poses a suspicion of fraud on the beneficiaries. This is even more true with Sarkozy's projected new rules.

Furthermore:

  • Pôle emploi is understaffed: councillors should accompany no more than 60 job seekers (according to government objectives). They actually follow around 110 in average and much more in some areas. And this is worsening with the growth in unemployment.
  • Many Pôle Emploi councillors do not have the right skills to help job seekers
  • There is already not enough money to finance relevant training courses for job seekers.  

So, besides its despicable innuendo about "lazy" job seekers, there is no way to implent Sarkozy's proposal without a massive increase in financial and human resources...

"Dieu se rit des hommes qui se plaignent des conséquences alors qu'ils en chérissent les causes" Jacques-Bénigne Bossuet
by Melanchthon on Fri Feb 10th, 2012 at 11:35:00 AM EST
Once again, Sarkozy is blowing smoke around something that already exists (sanctions for jobseekers who refuse jobs or training) but that he knows is otherwise perceived by the ignoramuses who vote for his end of the spectrum.

The main thing is simply to validate and reinforce the prejudice in people's minds - of course the unemployed are rip-off merchants, of course the system is too permissive, of course the left and the spirit of soixante-huit are responsible.

by afew (afew(a in a circle)eurotrib_dot_com) on Fri Feb 10th, 2012 at 11:53:18 AM EST
[ Parent ]
The true delight of the Sarkozy Presidency has been his nearly complete lack of interest in actually implementing any of his suggestions.  He reminds me of Schwarzenegger in that way.  Mostly interested in the robes.
by paving on Mon Feb 13th, 2012 at 12:41:55 AM EST
[ Parent ]
And yet you still hear many people saying that one indisputable good thing about him is that he actually gets things done...

Earth provides enough to satisfy every man's need, but not every man's greed. Gandhi
by Cyrille (cyrillev domain yahoo.fr) on Mon Feb 13th, 2012 at 02:39:25 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Do they give examples?
by afew (afew(a in a circle)eurotrib_dot_com) on Mon Feb 13th, 2012 at 04:34:54 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Usually it's the reform of the judiciary. Or changes to the constitution.

Earth provides enough to satisfy every man's need, but not every man's greed. Gandhi
by Cyrille (cyrillev domain yahoo.fr) on Mon Feb 13th, 2012 at 05:06:28 AM EST
[ Parent ]
by Jerome a Paris (etg@eurotrib.com) on Sat Feb 11th, 2012 at 06:38:46 AM EST
Here is the lovely referendum poll question for visitors to the UMP website:

"For a more efficient fight against delinquent acts committed by a fringe of the population which has turned violation of criminal law into its habitual way of life, should foreigners responsible for such deeds be deported?"

by afew (afew(a in a circle)eurotrib_dot_com) on Wed Feb 15th, 2012 at 04:47:30 AM EST
I voted no. It's 50-50 now.

*Lunatic*, n.
One whose delusions are out of fashion.
by DoDo on Wed Feb 15th, 2012 at 07:21:13 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Me too. Still 50-50. Something tells e taht the result of this poll will be whatever they feel like.

Sweden's finest (and perhaps only) collaborative, leftist e-newspaper Synapze.se
by A swedish kind of death on Wed Feb 15th, 2012 at 07:35:58 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Me too. It's stuck on 50-50.
by afew (afew(a in a circle)eurotrib_dot_com) on Wed Feb 15th, 2012 at 08:05:38 AM EST
[ Parent ]
I would be very surprised if anything like 50% of visitors to the UMP website voted for leniency for foreign ruffians.

No, it's a pre-determined number, which is supposed to illustrate the fact that France is evenly split between the laxist Left and the rigorous Right. Subliminal message to suggest the dangers of a return of the left.

It is rightly acknowledged that people of faith have no monopoly of virtue - Queen Elizabeth II

by eurogreen on Wed Feb 15th, 2012 at 09:06:16 AM EST
[ Parent ]


Display:
Go to: [ European Tribune Homepage : Top of page : Top of comments ]