The European Tribune is a forum for thoughtful dialogue of European and international issues. You are invited to post comments and your own articles.
Please REGISTER to post.
by Metatone Wed Nov 20th, 2013 at 04:53:51 PM EST
I've been asked for a list of books by someone who wants to become more aware of politics and economics.
They have a long trip coming up, likely without internet - hence the need for books, rather than me just saying "Read ET."
All suggestions welcome!
So - suggestions welcome!
Feel free to stray in any direction you like - philosophy, science, etc.
We're talking a generally educated 18 yr old with intelligence, but not necessarily much background, so starter books first. Feel free to name advanced books, but please link them to a starter book.
Both eminently readable. The fact is that what we're experiencing right now is a top-down disaster. -Paul Krugman
The Global Minotaur by Yanis Varoufakis is a really good read with an excellent survey of economic history and the accompanying political economics from WW II to the present. To understand the social dimension of what economics has wrought I recommend Karl Polanyi's superb The Great Transformation 1944. It is a combination of the early social and economic history of England on the eve of the Industrial Revolution through the transformation of English society into a market economy plus the impact of that transformation in other countries. It will show the reader just what that meant. A foundational work neglected because it is too revealing. "It is not necessary to have hope in order to persevere."
Graeber Debt.
watching italians mourning the deaths from bad weather in sardegna (some avoidable if rescue efforts had been better funded, not to mention flood prevention schemes made with shoddy cement or stalled in piles of bureaucracy), while contemplating the latest edicts from the troika, or the price of new -apparently indispensable- f-35 jets, it seems like some are slowly getting it that it doesn't have to be this way.
and it always comes back to what keynes pointed out quite clearly to non-dummies so long ago.
so keynesianism needs to be spelled out in no uncertain terms as the true understanding of how economies work.
'renter euthanasia' needs to become as common a parlance as 'power to the people' or 'workers of the world unite'. right now keynes' prose, elegant, succinct and logical as it is, flies right over most folks' heads... whooooosh!
yet is keynesianism really above the intellectual range of a 12 year old, if rendered in such a way as would be the most pedagogically advanced? we have surely come a long way since then at simplifying matters once deemed too arcane for public consumption, like relativity, quantum theory and mechanics etc.
doubtless there are scads of funny, creative vids on utoob, maybe that's the way forward as more kids watch them than read... economics is veiled in mystification, but even the most counter-intuitive parts of keynes' reasoning is utterly coherent with history so really shouldn't be rocket science, it seems after perusing all the motley ruminations on ET since the net was knee-high.
ET's brainz trust could definitely write it, a good cartoonist would help a lot too.
then we could all help it go viral, sharing until our mice beg for mercy. 'The history of public debt is full of irony. It rarely follows our ideas of order and justice.' Thomas Piketty
That sounds like something the 1% may have in mind. Keynes talked about euthanasia of the rentier. He expected it to happen naturally, but he was wrong.
i-rent? 'The history of public debt is full of irony. It rarely follows our ideas of order and justice.' Thomas Piketty
If nothing else it's a vaccine against a whole ton of Neo-Classical Intellectual Diseases. She believed in nothing; only her skepticism kept her from being an atheist. -- Jean-Paul Sartre
For economical history I would rather recommend reading Ferdinand Braudels' Civilizations and Capitalism which gives a broad overview of global economic history with a focus on industrialisation and Europe. If it is too heavy the summary, The Dynamics of Capitalism, condenses the argument but leaves out much of bildung.
The Great Divergence by Kenneth Pommeranz and The Industrious revolution are other interesting takes on industrialisation and economic development, but are not good as starting points since they are so driven by their respective thesis.
Tony Judts' Postwar - a history of Europe since 1945 is a magisterial overview of modern European history. It is an excellent foundation from which to approach more thesis driven works about Europe today.
Civilizations and Capitalism which gives a broad overview of global economic history with a focus on industrialisation and Europe.
- Jake Friends come and go. Enemies accumulate.
China was the dominating economy in the ca. 1450-1650 and very powerful after that. Silver flowed to China in enormous quantities in exchange for luxury goods. After that the Europeans dominated global trade and controlled important parts of the regional asian trade as well. The european economy was also devloping technologically at quick pace and becoming even less labour intensive than Chinas. Chinas economic development went into a significant population expansion, and the colonisation of highland and periphery.
you are the media you consume.
Lewis writes a compelling narrative. It will increase your understanding of the financial shenanigans, and possibly deepen your cynicism about Wall Street. But you will find this story fascinating. It reads just as well as a good novel. Too bad it's not fiction.
For the politics: Profit Over People, Noam Chomsky; from a review by someone of about the same age:
Chomsky's Profit Over People is an insighful and at times shocking analysis of the true motives and practices of multinational corporations and the governement economic policies they operate within. Chomsky spares no time in hammering his message against the concentration of power in the hands of the few through the use of several detailed case studies. As a student of economics and finance at Oklahoma State University, this book caused me to step back and question the very foundation of Smith's free market theory which has comprised my studies thus far. As a reader, I became disgusted by the prospect of private interests having the ability to manipulate the world economy, government policy, and the subposively "free" press to serve their own greed-driven interests while watching the masses suffer.
The excellent: 23 Things They Don't Tell You About Capitalism, Ha-Joon Chang
in which he presents the mainstream views then tears them apart with convincing evidence. Maybe it's because I'm a Londoner - that I moved to Nice.
And I'd recommend reading The Great Crash 1929 before either of Lewis' books. Lewis tells the story of that which is different, but that story is best understood through the perspective granted by the story of that which is the same.
Galbraith: The Great Crash 1929, then The Affluent Society, then The New Industrial State.
Reich, Robert: Supercapitalism
Kalecki: Political Aspects of Full Employment.
An unabridged version of Wealth of Nations is also highly recommended, albeit of less contemporary relevance.
Reading order doesn't matter much, except that Supercapitalism should be read after The New Industrial State, as it builds upon and extends the discussion therein.
The approach of the Swedish cooperatives (consumer) to pricing is interesting. They purposely attacked those products with the greatest profit margins. With the internet, this whole model seems to present intriguing possibilities. The section on the Phoebus Cartel seems most relevant.
Imagine if you had a coop website that broke down where the money went, and challenged firms in the rest of the economy to do the same. When you go to get a car fixed you expect a breakdown of part costs, labor, etc. Why the hell shouldn't we expect the same when we make any other purchase? And I'll give my consent to any government that does not deny a man a living wage-Billy Bragg
Thorstein Veblen: The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
John K Galbraith: The Great Crash, 1929
Irving Fisher's paper on The Debt-Deflation Theory of Great Depressions is available in book form, and it's just 46 pages.
And finally, oral history:
Studs Terkel: Hard Times A society committed to the notion that government is always bad will have bad government. And it doesn't have to be that way. — Paul Krugman
must-reads also 'working' and 'the good war'.
so accessible, so evocative...
sorta like a cross of kuralt, bageant and moyers, with bells on. 'The history of public debt is full of irony. It rarely follows our ideas of order and justice.' Thomas Piketty
by John Kenneth Galbraith Point n'est besoin d'espérer pour entreprendre, ni de réussir pour persévérer. - Charles le Téméraire
by Frank Schnittger - May 31
by Oui - May 30 25 comments
by Frank Schnittger - May 23 3 comments
by Frank Schnittger - May 27 3 comments
by Frank Schnittger - May 5 22 comments
by Oui - May 13 66 comments
by Oui - Jun 225 comments
by Oui - Jun 17 comments
by Oui - May 3145 comments
by Oui - May 3025 comments
by Frank Schnittger - May 273 comments
by Oui - May 2737 comments
by Oui - May 24
by Frank Schnittger - May 233 comments
by Oui - May 1366 comments
by Oui - May 913 comments
by Frank Schnittger - May 522 comments
by Oui - May 450 comments
by Oui - May 312 comments
by Oui - Apr 30273 comments
by Oui - Apr 2652 comments
by Oui - Apr 895 comments
by Oui - Mar 19145 comments